Ofcom

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.

This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼

This Article Requires Additional Verification

---

This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!

Why This Article Is In Question

---

Articles in this wiki are required to:

• Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
• Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
• Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.

Examples of issues that trigger this notice:

• A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
• Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
• Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.

How You Can Improve This Article

---

To address verification concerns:

• Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
• Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
• Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
  • Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
  • Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.

If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.

Template:Infobox government agency The Office of Communications (commonly known as Ofcom) is the United Kingdom’s communications regulator, responsible for overseeing television, radio, telecommunications, postal services, and the radio spectrum. Established under the Office of Communications Act 2002 and formally launched in 2003, Ofcom replaced multiple legacy regulators and has since become the central authority for communications policy in the UK.^{[citation needed]} Its mandate includes protecting consumers, promoting competition, and ensuring compliance with broadcasting standards.

Consumer and public impact

Consumer protection

Ofcom plays a significant role in defending consumer rights in telecommunications and broadcasting.^{[citation needed]} It enforces rules on fair pricing, transparency of contracts, accessibility of services, and the quality of broadband and mobile coverage. It also has powers to impose fines on companies that breach regulations or mislead customers. Critics argue, however, that enforcement has not always kept pace with industry practices, and that large telecom providers retain significant market power despite regulatory oversight.^{[citation needed]}

Freedom of expression

The regulator is frequently at the centre of debates around free speech, given its authority to fine or revoke licences from broadcasters who breach the Broadcasting Code.^{[citation needed]} While intended to protect the public from harmful or misleading content, detractors contend that Ofcom’s interventions risk constraining journalistic freedom or setting limits on controversial speech.^{[citation needed]}

Digital markets

Ofcom has been tasked with overseeing aspects of online safety and regulating major digital platforms following the passage of the Online Safety Act 2023.^{[citation needed]} This expansion of its powers has been welcomed by those concerned about harmful content online, but civil liberties groups warn of potential overreach, surveillance concerns, and risks to user privacy.^{[citation needed]}

Notable controversies

Handling of broadband complaints

Consumer groups have accused Ofcom of failing to adequately penalize large internet service providers for poor service delivery and misleading pricing practices.^{[citation needed]} Despite repeated investigations, critics argue that penalties are often too small to deter misconduct.^{[citation needed]}

Press and broadcasting regulation

Ofcom has faced criticism for rulings on high-profile media cases, including politically sensitive broadcast content.^{[citation needed]} Some commentators argue that its decisions show inconsistency or political bias, while others view its role as essential for maintaining public trust in media standards.^{[citation needed]}

Surveillance and data concerns

With the introduction of the Online Safety Act, Ofcom has been given powers to compel platforms to monitor and remove harmful material.^{[citation needed]} Privacy advocates argue that these requirements could force companies to weaken encryption and intrude on users’ communications, raising ethical and legal challenges.^{[citation needed]}

See also

• Online Safety Act 2023
• Communications in the United Kingdom
• Media regulation