❗Article Status Notice: Inappropriate Tone/Word Usage
This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
Specifically it uses wording throughout that is non-compliant with the Editorial guidelines of this wiki.
Learn more ▼
How You Can Help:
If this is a non-Theme article (See: Article types):
Persuasive language should not be used in the Wiki's voice. Avoid loaded words, or the causing of unnecessary offense, wherever possible.
No direct attacks on named individuals or companies. Malice may be attributed to bad and proven offenders, but only through the use of quotation and citation - never in the Wiki's voice.
If this is a Theme article:
Where argumentation is used make sure it is clear and direct but not inflammatory. Avoid strong language, or causing unnecessary offense.
No direct attacks on named individuals or companies. Malice may be attributed to bad and proven offenders, in a formal and calm manner.
This notice will be removed once sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit either the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel.
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
Learn more ▼
Issues may include:
This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content
How you can help:
Add documented examples with verifiable sources
Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
⚠️Article status notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review
This article has been flagged for questionable relevance. Its connection to the systemic consumer protection issues outlined in the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines isn't clear.
Learn more ▼
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once you have made the required improvements, please visit the Moderators' noticeboard or the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join Here.
Notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review
To justify the relevance of this article:
Provide evidence demonstrating how the issue reflects broader consumer exploitation (e.g., systemic patterns, recurring incidents, or related company policies).
Link the problem to modern forms of consumer protection concerns, such as privacy violations, barriers to repair, or ownership rights.
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once you have made the required improvements, please visit either the Moderator's noticeboard, or the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join Here. There may be a discussion about this article on its talk page.
12VHPWR and its revision 12V-2x6 (H++) are modern PCIe power connector standards published by the PCI-SIG that aim to deliver more power to PCIe devices such as GPUs but in a smaller foorprint than the older PCIe 6- and 8-pin connectors.[citation needed] Since 12VHPWR's debut on Nvidia's RTX 40-series GPUs,[1] the connector's been infamous for its design flaws that make it quite prone to ignition.[1][2] The minor revision 12V-2x6 aimed to mitigate these issues but ultimately succumbed to it's predecessor's shortcomings.[1] As of July 2025, there are still reports of the connectors catching on fire even when using accessories that advertise less risk of catching ablaze.[3]
An early iteration of the connector without the sense pins first appeared on PCI-SIG member Nvidia's RTX 3090 Founders Edition (FE) graphics cards. Since then Nvidia has used the connector on some of their RTX 40 Series GPUs and all RTX 50 Series GPUs.
Melting connectors
Since its first debut on the RTX 4090, the connector has faced a myriad of incidents all revolving around them melting.[2] As an effect Thermal Grizzly, a computer cooling company started by XOC enthusiast Der8auer, cannot guarantee their WireView, that uses the connector, as fail-proof.[4]
Initital round of investigations led some to blame the incident on user error. Referencing improper insertion of the connector into the receptacle, leading to subpar contact between the conductors.
Industry response
Despite the gaping shortcomings, the connector was formally adopted as a part of PCI Express 5.
Lawsuit
If applicable, add any information regarding litigation around the incident here.
Claims
Main claims of the suit.
Rebuttal
The response of the company or counterclaims.
Outcome
The outcome of the suit, if any.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.
Consumer response
Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.