This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
Learn more ▼
Issues may include:
- This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
- This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
- More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
- The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
- The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content
How you can help:
- Add documented examples with verifiable sources
- Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
- Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
- Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
- Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
This article contains sources and content, but is lacking proper format and needs more development to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and provide a high quality and consistent experience for readers.
Learn more ▼
Issues may include:
- The article is not following the correct outline for its subject (i.e. incident, company, product)
- This article contains references that do not utilize the <ref></ref> tags or Cite web template.
- The article has "WIP" mentioned next to content
- A quote longer than two sentences does not use the Quote template.
How you can help:
- Copy and paste the layout from the aforementioned preload templates (depending on the article's topic)
- Take URLs, convert them for the Cite web template, and insert them into the correct sentence where the source can verify a claim.
- Remove personal notes left by editors either with <!-- [text here] --> in source editor or when the article is close to being fully cleaned up.
- Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
The Federal Trade Commission took action against Intuit Inc., the maker of the popular TurboTax tax filing software, [1]by issuing an administrative complaint against the company for deceiving consumers with bogus advertisements pitching “free” tax filing that millions of consumers could not use. In addition, to prevent ongoing harm to consumers rushing to file their taxes, the Commission also filed a federal district court complaint asking a court to order Intuit to halt its deceptive advertising immediately.
Background
Since 2015 Intuit inc. (makers of the popular turbo tax software) has ran commercials stating customers could file for free. Most of the ads people have seen are as the FTC complaint put " usse the word almost exclusivly ". People v. Intuit (LA City) filed May 6, 2019 saught to remidy the comercials as many people found that they would be charged to file with the popular tax software and later found 2/3 of all people would not be able to even use the free version of the software. A settelment of 28 million was offered but declined as inadiquite in late 2021. At the same time as the LA lawsiut began the FTC filed a C.I.D (Civil Investigation Demand).Class Action Prelim. Approval Denied Mar. 5, 2021 marks the end of the lawsuit for the time. Intuit's chair meeting concluded on march 24 2022 and by march 28 the ftc started the offical lawsiut.
Noted by the FTC [2] , They have reason to believe that the named defendants are violating or are about to violate the law and it appears to the Commission that a proceeding is in the public interest. The case will be decided by the court.
The Administrative complaint [3] had 122 paragraphs of statments brought by the FTC, Most of these paragraphs are evidence of the free wording used and the non disclosures of payments needed to use the software. Later in the documents Intuit had denied any wrong-doing.
[Incident]
Change this section's title to be descriptive of the incident.
Impartial and complete description of the events, including actions taken by the company, and the timeline of the incident coming to the public's attention.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.
[Company]'s response
If applicable, add the proposed solution to the issues by the company.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.
Lawsuit
If applicable, add any information regarding litigation around the incident here.
Claims
Main claims of the suit.
Rebuttal
The response of the company or counterclaims.
Outcome
The outcome of the suit, if any.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.
[4]
Consumer response
Summary and key issues of prevailing sentiment from the consumers and commentators that can be documented via articles, emails to support, reviews and forum posts.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.
References