Ars Technica fake AI article on AI accusations
Ars Technica published an article[1] on a programmer who was being "bullied" by an AI autonomous agent. The article was written using AI, with non-existant quotations. The article was later removed and Ars Technica published an editor's note[2] explaing what happened.
Background
[edit | edit source]Scott Shambaugh (contributor of the matplotlib library on github) created a good first issue/first contribution [check needed here of which one was it, seems to be the same for this repo], and got an OpenClaw agent pull request[3] as fix for the issue. The pull request got closed, the AI Agent got mad, so the AI Agent generated a post on its blog[4], and also Scott wrote a blog post. [5]
Incident
[edit | edit source]Ars Technica (authors listed are "Benj Edwards and Kyle Orland") wrote an article on the situation, but the hit piece's contained AI allucinated quotations.
Ars Technica's response
[edit | edit source]The Ars Technica's staff wrote an Editor’s Note explaining briefly explaining what happened. The article author also wrote an apology on BlueSky[6]
References
[edit | edit source]- ↑ Ars Staff (2026-02-13). "Retraction: After a routine code rejection, an AI agent published a hit piece on someone by name". ArsTechnica. Archived from the original on 2026-02-13.
- ↑ Fisher, Ken (2026-02-15). "Editor's Note: Retraction of article containing fabricated quotations". ArsTechnica.
- ↑ @crabby-rathbun (2026-02-10). "[PERF] Replace np.column_stack with np.vstack().T". GitHub.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ @crabby-rathbun (2026-02-11). "Commit 83b7d60". GitHub.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ↑ Shambaugh, Scott (2026-02-12). "An AI Agent Published a Hit Piece on Me". The Shamblog.
- ↑ Edwards, Benj (2026-02-15). "Apology". Bluesky.
Sorry all this is my fault; and speculation has grown worse because I have been sick in bed with a high fever and unable to reliably address it (still am sick) I was told by management not to comment until they did. Here is my statement in images below arstechnica.com/staff/2026/02/editors-note-retraction-of-article-containing-fabricated-quotations/
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)