Editing Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Moderator guidelines

== Just a few typos ==

#* Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable  <-notable
        
# The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article

#* The level of managerial independance <- independence

#* The level of managerial independance - how independant  <- independent

* Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <-

lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <-

Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision

* Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through

* If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <-

* '''The article should be neutral and factual,''' without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily 

A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization 
#* Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation?

#* Remove aricle, <-

A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised?

-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025‎

The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)