Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Adapt videos to articles
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Consumer_Action_Taskforce
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Forced arbitration hidden inside packaging
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Background: arbitration and lead-contaminated products== [[File:Screenshot of Mastodon Post.png|thumb|Screenshot of the Mastodon post recording the incident. ]] This article focuses on hidden forced arbitration (a practice wherein the terms of service are shown only after opening the package), dubbed "shrinkwrap arbitration"—specifically by [[Vital Proteins]], a collagen supplement provider and [[Costco]], a wholesale store. The company has a history of anti-consumer practices. In 2018, Vital Proteins filed for settlement in the Superior Court of the State of California over lead and cadmium in their products.<ref>Superior Court of the State of California County of Alameda, Stipulated Consent Judgement, Environmental Research Center Inc. vs. Vital Proteins, LLC and DOES 1-100. Case RG18905420. https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/prop65/settlements/2017-02480S6659.pdf</ref> No demonstrably safe threshold for lead exposure has been identified.<ref>Vorvolakos T, Arseniou S, Samakouri M. There is no safe threshold for lead exposure: Α literature review. Psychiatriki. 2016 Jul-Sep;27(3):204-214. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2016.273.204. PMID: 27837574. </ref> [[Forced arbitration|Arbitration]] is an alternative to court proceedings. It is alternative proceeding, conducted off of the public record, and away from the eyes of investors, and other potential plaintiffs. Arbitration may include nondisclosure agreements. It avoids costly court procedures, but it strips citizens of their due process rights. Forced arbitration suffers numerous critiques. The business is a repeat customer of the arbitrator, so the business has an undue appearance of influence. Arbitration can be used to avoid court for cases which may otherwise be things such as liability for [[Disney wrongful-death lawsuit|wrongful death]] or sexual assault.<ref>Sara Ashley O'Brien, Nelli Black, Curt Devine and Drew Griffin, CNN, ''CNN investigation: 103 Uber drivers accused of sexual assault or abuse, September 18, 2018'' https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/28/tech/uber-driver-sexual-assault/index.html</ref>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer_Action_Taskforce are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Action Taskforce:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)