Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Categories
Random page
Top Contributors
Recent changes
Contribute
Create a page
How to help
Wiki policy
Article suggestion list
Articles in need of work
Help
Frequently asked questions
Join the discord!
Help about MediaWiki
Moderators' noticeboard
Report a bug
Consumer Rights Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Talk:Futurehome Smarthub Mandatory Subscription Fee
(section)
Add topic
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit source
Add topic
View history
Purge cache
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Cargo data
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Re: how lying companies damage the Rossmann brand == Since no email was provided, only the URL to history page, I suppose I shall write here. Best I can suggest is to archive any and all pages you refer to in videos on as many archiving services as possible. There's a Firefox addon "Web Archives" that should make it a little faster to do, however an automated solution would certainly be an improvement. It's not unlikely there's an equivalent to overcast07/wayback-machine-spn-scripts that also archives to other services. As for having a provable copy of a page with proof better than just "trust me bro", I don't think there is a way. It looks like you can only trust copies based on who hosts them. Additionally, note the "why" field on IA in case an archivist group is the source instead of IA itself, because that's another way to archive to Wayback Machine. So, why not? A raw copy of the page secured by SSL wouldn't prove anything because an active session uses a symmetric key, which essentially means you can fake it by using any random key and encrypt the message with it. Since the key is always random, it proves nothing. Unless the host cryptographically signs their pages (which would, of course, not be desirable for hiding the past), I don't think there's another way. Maybe another idea would be to push for a law that force the website to archive any change that they made to ensure no fraud is made, or to push a law or exception to allow archiving website to keep the archive of the website for potentiel proof that a company did commits a crime and would try to hide any evidence of said crime those giving us the consumer probably the only way to get evidence and proove them of there wrong.
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Consumer Rights Wiki are considered to be released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (see
Consumer Rights Wiki:Copyrights
for details). If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly and redistributed at will, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource.
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
To protect the wiki against automated edit spam, we kindly ask you to solve the following hCaptcha:
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)