Editing Nixplay (section)

===Koeller v. Nixplay, Inc. – Lawsuit Summary (Filed April 22, 2025)===
'''Overview'''

This class-action lawsuit alleges that Nixplay engaged in bait-and-switch tactics by advertising its digital photo frames as including '''lifetime features''' like:

*'''Unlimited photo storage'''
*'''5 GB video storage'''
*'''Google Photos and Dropbox integration'''
*All '''with “no subscription necessary”'''

Plaintiffs claim these features were promised at purchase and upheld for several years—until March 2025.

'''What Changed'''

Nixplay announced the retirement of the free "Standard" plan and migration of users to a crippled "Basic" plan:

*Photo storage cut to '''0.5 GB'''
*Video storage cut to '''0.5 GB'''
*Google Photos/Dropbox integration removed
*Content exceeding limits became '''locked and inaccessible''' unless users subscribed

'''Legal Claims'''

The plaintiffs (Kate & Jeff Koeller and Matt Davidson) allege Nixplay:

*Violated '''California's Consumer Legal Remedies Act'''
*Engaged in '''false advertising'''
*Committed '''unfair competition'''
*'''Broke its contracts''' with users

'''What They’re Asking For'''

*An injunction forcing Nixplay to:
**'''Unlock user content'''
**'''Restore promised features'''
**'''Prohibit future removals of included features'''
*Attorneys’ fees and court costs

'''Jurisdiction'''

Filed in '''Santa Clara County Superior Court''', California. Case number: '''25CV464129'''.