Jump to content

Jones v. Ford Motor Co.: Revision history

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

7 April 2026

  • curprev 22:4122:41, 7 April 2026 Louis talk contribs 10,262 bytes +2,216 added context from the ritch v honda companion memo (22-35448): panel composition, rule 36-3 non-precedential status, ritch plaintiffs, estudillo presiding over both cases, the 9th's 'virtually identical' framing, and ritch's independent statutory-injury holding. also fixed a lede mischaracterization of the jones holding undo
  • curprev 01:4601:46, 7 April 2026 Louis talk contribs 8,046 bytes +250 No edit summary undo Tag: Visual edit
  • curprev 01:3101:31, 7 April 2026 Louis talk contribs 7,796 bytes +7,796 Initial publish: 9th Circuit Jones v. Ford Motor Co. (Oct. 27, 2023) per curiam affirming dismissal of Washington Privacy Act class actions over infotainment text-message and call-log capture. Companion Ritch v. American Honda memorandum. RCW 9.73.060 civil damages.
Retrieved from "https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Jones_v._Ford_Motor_Co."