Talk:Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→Add how the update impacts the Pixel 4a: new section |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''Please see [[ | ''Please see [[Consumer Action Taskforce:Talk page guidelines]] for instructions on how to use the talk page.'' | ||
== Add pictures suggestion == | ==Add pictures suggestion== | ||
:since the article states "While there is widespread speculation about a battery manufacturing fault", I suggest adding pics from "https://old.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1hxyp6z/certainly_seems_battery_defectrelated_vs_planned/" as further motivation for such speculation. | :since the article states "While there is widespread speculation about a battery manufacturing fault", I suggest adding pics from "https://old.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1hxyp6z/certainly_seems_battery_defectrelated_vs_planned/" as further motivation for such speculation. | ||
:Google doesn't normally require such special "box for defective lithium ion batteries" to mail-in phones for repairs (some users said in the comments this might just be good practice and business as usual when sending phones for repair but it's really not), so the reasoning for doing it this time around seems clear enough to me and would add very strong evidence to this speculation. | :Google doesn't normally require such special "box for defective lithium ion batteries" to mail-in phones for repairs (some users said in the comments this might just be good practice and business as usual when sending phones for repair but it's really not), so the reasoning for doing it this time around seems clear enough to me and would add very strong evidence to this speculation. | ||
:Samsung sent out a very similar box (https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Note-7-return-kit.png) when the note 7 thing happened. | :Samsung sent out a very similar box (https://www.cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Note-7-return-kit.png) when the note 7 thing happened. | ||
: I'd also maybe add a seventh point in "Criticism by Community" about users reporting their battery percentage indicator stop working entirely, and in point 3. imo it should be made more clear that a payoneer account with full personal info (including social security number) must be created by the user (potential security/privacy issue), I know there's already the "account fees" part but in the way it's written it's not clear the user has to make a proper account in the first place. | :I'd also maybe add a seventh point in "Criticism by Community" about users reporting their battery percentage indicator stop working entirely, and in point 3. imo it should be made more clear that a payoneer account with full personal info (including social security number) must be created by the user (potential security/privacy issue), I know there's already the "account fees" part but in the way it's written it's not clear the user has to make a proper account in the first place. | ||
: Maybe I should've made this edit myself, but english isn't my native language, I don't think i'm very good at writing formally in cases like this, and just didn't feel comfortable messing with other people's excellent work. | :Maybe I should've made this edit myself, but english isn't my native language, I don't think i'm very good at writing formally in cases like this, and just didn't feel comfortable messing with other people's excellent work. | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:Thank you for your suggestions, I'll get to editing soon. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 18:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | :Thank you for your suggestions, I'll get to editing soon. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 18:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
:: I implemented the edits. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ::I implemented the edits. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Google Support section == | ==Google Support section== | ||
:On another note, I wish there was a wiki-appropriate way to talk about how weird Google Support has been throughout this, but none of those things were said "officially" and many reports just come from users recounting what they talked about (I feel like I'm already on thin ice with all the Reddit posts I'm sourcing from). There was that one post that asked Google Support about turning in their phone for cash and them saying that the phone would be worth *less money* if they installed the new software update (again, unconfirmed, someone just said this). I also talked to them at one point and they told me my device would be considered impacted if it had worse battery performance AFTER the update, despite the compensation form being live based on the IMEI before the update was ever rolled out. It is probably just that the Support Team doesn't have a very clear understanding of the issue, but it's interesting that if that is the case, a lot of the misinformation has been coming directly from Google. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | :On another note, I wish there was a wiki-appropriate way to talk about how weird Google Support has been throughout this, but none of those things were said "officially" and many reports just come from users recounting what they talked about (I feel like I'm already on thin ice with all the Reddit posts I'm sourcing from). There was that one post that asked Google Support about turning in their phone for cash and them saying that the phone would be worth *less money* if they installed the new software update (again, unconfirmed, someone just said this). I also talked to them at one point and they told me my device would be considered impacted if it had worse battery performance AFTER the update, despite the compensation form being live based on the IMEI before the update was ever rolled out. It is probably just that the Support Team doesn't have a very clear understanding of the issue, but it's interesting that if that is the case, a lot of the misinformation has been coming directly from Google. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:59, 19 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
::Maybe you could ask those users to provide a copy of the support conversation? Google support gives you the option to send you a copy of the whole chat log at the end of each support request | ::Maybe you could ask those users to provide a copy of the support conversation? Google support gives you the option to send you a copy of the whole chat log at the end of each support request | ||
== 21/01/25 - Anonymous user again here == | ==21/01/25 - Anonymous user again here== | ||
10 days ago, I asked iFixit support whether the batteries they are currently selling are some sort of newer batch that isn't affected by this problem or not<br> | 10 days ago, I asked iFixit support whether the batteries they are currently selling are some sort of newer batch that isn't affected by this problem or not<br> | ||
their response: sorry for the late reply, it took us a while to figure this one out, "The issue is with the device itself and not the batteries, We suggest you go through Google to see if your device is impacted"<br> | their response: sorry for the late reply, it took us a while to figure this one out, "The issue is with the device itself and not the batteries, We suggest you go through Google to see if your device is impacted"<br> | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
this whole situation keeps getting more and more absurd | this whole situation keeps getting more and more absurd | ||
:: Dear Anon, that's an insane revelation. I'm trying to think whether there's somehow a mysterious third option we're missing that isn't planned obsolescence OR a manufacturing fault. Because your point A is absolutely correct, the battery replacement angle makes no sense in this case. I get if there's a hazard, Google wouldn't just plain say that, but why would they not just tell iFixit something like "oh, the Pixel 4a's batteries are just old, these are newer replacements". What do they mean there's a problem with the device?! There's no way to read this other than "Yeah, there's a problem with the device. We made a problem, with the update, on purpose.". I think this is worth adding to the article, if you can source it somehow. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 18:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | ::Dear Anon, that's an insane revelation. I'm trying to think whether there's somehow a mysterious third option we're missing that isn't planned obsolescence OR a manufacturing fault. Because your point A is absolutely correct, the battery replacement angle makes no sense in this case. I get if there's a hazard, Google wouldn't just plain say that, but why would they not just tell iFixit something like "oh, the Pixel 4a's batteries are just old, these are newer replacements". What do they mean there's a problem with the device?! There's no way to read this other than "Yeah, there's a problem with the device. We made a problem, with the update, on purpose.". I think this is worth adding to the article, if you can source it somehow. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 18:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
::: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i6ei4x/the_pixel_discount_does_stack_with_the_sale/ . Okay, you know what? Maybe Google REALLY ARE just this inept at public relations. Updating the article to include it... [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | :::https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i6ei4x/the_pixel_discount_does_stack_with_the_sale/ . Okay, you know what? Maybe Google REALLY ARE just this inept at public relations. Updating the article to include it... [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:01, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
::::> I think this is worth adding to the article, if you can source it somehow. | ::::> I think this is worth adding to the article, if you can source it somehow. | ||
Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
::::maybe I should've asked if he was okay with this in the reply I sent him hours ago, but it's too late now I think, let me know if I'm just overthinking this and providing a copy of the email isn't that big of a deal | ::::maybe I should've asked if he was okay with this in the reply I sent him hours ago, but it's too late now I think, let me know if I'm just overthinking this and providing a copy of the email isn't that big of a deal | ||
::::: I feel like it's fine to censor their name, poor support person has nothing to do with this. I don't think it makes the screenshot any more or less legit. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | :::::I feel like it's fine to censor their name, poor support person has nothing to do with this. I don't think it makes the screenshot any more or less legit. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 19:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::::: https://files.catbox.moe/lwkeo4.png | ::::::https://files.catbox.moe/lwkeo4.png | ||
== 22/01/25 Some more anon considerations == | ==22/01/25 Some more anon considerations== | ||
I wasn't aware of the "Frequently asked questions" at the bottom of "https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15701861", actually, I'm pretty sure it wasn't there at first but looking at the internet archive page of the 7th january, it has always been there, you also mentioned missing it in a reddit comment (in fact, that's how I found out about it), very very odd.<br> | I wasn't aware of the "Frequently asked questions" at the bottom of "https://support.google.com/pixelphone/answer/15701861", actually, I'm pretty sure it wasn't there at first but looking at the internet archive page of the 7th january, it has always been there, you also mentioned missing it in a reddit comment (in fact, that's how I found out about it), very very odd.<br> | ||
Anyways, I found a couple of things here interesting<br> | Anyways, I found a couple of things here interesting<br> | ||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
well, at least one thing is clear: the situation is really messed up in both cases. | well, at least one thing is clear: the situation is really messed up in both cases. | ||
== 23/01/25 - Anonymous user reporting a rather important update == | ==23/01/25 - Anonymous user reporting a rather important update== | ||
Google seems to have quietly removed all previous pixel 4a software builds from their developer portal (initial source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i7tmmb/cannot_locate_tq3a230805001s1_build_for_update/)<br> | Google seems to have quietly removed all previous pixel 4a software builds from their developer portal (initial source: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1i7tmmb/cannot_locate_tq3a230805001s1_build_for_update/)<br> | ||
1. https://files.catbox.moe/t5kvmh.png as you can see here, phones before and after the 4a have all sorts of builds of all versions of android (going back as far as android 2.3.6 for the original Nexus S), but the 4a only has the latest a13 update, archive.org doesn't seem to work as the list is loaded dynamically via javascript or something so the available builds don't display there.<br> | 1. https://files.catbox.moe/t5kvmh.png as you can see here, phones before and after the 4a have all sorts of builds of all versions of android (going back as far as android 2.3.6 for the original Nexus S), but the 4a only has the latest a13 update, archive.org doesn't seem to work as the list is loaded dynamically via javascript or something so the available builds don't display there.<br> | ||
Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
<b>Factory/OTA images before the battery killer update are still available in the first post of this XDA thread</b>: https://xdaforums.com/t/changes-coming-to-your-pixel-4a.4712085/<br> | <b>Factory/OTA images before the battery killer update are still available in the first post of this XDA thread</b>: https://xdaforums.com/t/changes-coming-to-your-pixel-4a.4712085/<br> | ||
full list of builds that were removed: https://pastebin.com/0Cw8iDUf, you can still find one or two download sources for each one by googling it, but be careful, I couldn't find the hashes of the original files so there's no way of knowing if there's malware or else embedded into these random downloads scattered around the web, plus all of these are one site closure (or DMCA takedown from google) away from being lost media, those that have the possibility of making an archive, backups, maybe a torrent file or else: please do (by making them available in the previously linked xda thread). Preserving the latest A10/A11/A12/A13S1 builds should take priority (imo), keep in mind older custom roms also need these factory images to work in most cases.<br> | full list of builds that were removed: https://pastebin.com/0Cw8iDUf, you can still find one or two download sources for each one by googling it, but be careful, I couldn't find the hashes of the original files so there's no way of knowing if there's malware or else embedded into these random downloads scattered around the web, plus all of these are one site closure (or DMCA takedown from google) away from being lost media, those that have the possibility of making an archive, backups, maybe a torrent file or else: please do (by making them available in the previously linked xda thread). Preserving the latest A10/A11/A12/A13S1 builds should take priority (imo), keep in mind older custom roms also need these factory images to work in most cases.<br> | ||
: Please, please please upload these ROMs to a thread on XDA and then link back to it here. '''There's no way the mods can verify your torrent link or your direct link.''' You are also claiming Google will DMCA any reuploads, by that assumption do you not think Google will then also DMCA this wiki for hosting links to the reuploaded material? I am removing them for now. A moderator will need to go through history and clean up. [[User:Karar|Karar]] ([[User talk:Karar|talk]]) 21:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | :Please, please please upload these ROMs to a thread on XDA and then link back to it here. '''There's no way the mods can verify your torrent link or your direct link.''' You are also claiming Google will DMCA any reuploads, by that assumption do you not think Google will then also DMCA this wiki for hosting links to the reuploaded material? I am removing them for now. A moderator will need to go through history and clean up. [[User:Karar|Karar]] ([[User talk:Karar|talk]]) 21:32, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
::Reply: | ::Reply: | ||
::sorry for that, I should've cleared up where I sourced that stuff from.<br> | ::sorry for that, I should've cleared up where I sourced that stuff from.<br> | ||
Line 82: | Line 82: | ||
:::I've asked the mods about this, they say they're not interested in verifying contents of torrent links. Feel free to link to XDA. [[User:Karar|Karar]] ([[User talk:Karar|talk]]) 21:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | :::I've asked the mods about this, they say they're not interested in verifying contents of torrent links. Feel free to link to XDA. [[User:Karar|Karar]] ([[User talk:Karar|talk]]) 21:58, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::Hey, just to verify Karars claim, we would appreciate it if you refrain from posting direct magnet links. Links to xda or even an article/section on this issue sources would be fine. Its less the fear of dmca and more the issue of verification of downloads we don't want to deal with. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 22:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | :::Hey, just to verify Karars claim, we would appreciate it if you refrain from posting direct magnet links. Links to xda or even an article/section on this issue sources would be fine. Its less the fear of dmca and more the issue of verification of downloads we don't want to deal with. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 22:03, 23 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
==24/01/25 Fitbit Sense and Versa 3 smartwatches getting the same exact treatment== | |||
https://www.techradar.com/health-fitness/smartwatches/fitbit-issues-battery-overheating-warning-over-two-of-its-most-popular-watches-and-it-might-compensate-you-if-youre-affected<br> | |||
TL:DR: firmware update and 50$ compensation for affected users<br> | |||
what's interesting is that these smartwatches were released about a month after the Pixel 4a<br> | |||
this might actually deserve its own thread... and maybe its own video too. | |||
[[Special:Contributions/2A0E:410:9B22:0:397B:33BE:AA7D:629E|Anonymous]] ([[User:2A0E:410:9B22:0:397B:33BE:AA7D:629E|talk]]) 14:09, 24 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:Really interesting. That makes the theory that the batteries are actually defective in more than one SKU/batch hold a lot more water for me. Page worthy, even just for the connection to this I'd think [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 15:59, 24 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Google Customer Support says users that didn't update the firmware will experience a forced factory reset (with installation of the new firmware) on january 30== | |||
https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1id6zw8/attention_google_customer_service_said_device/<br> | |||
this is very likely just misinformation (the only thing google support has been capable of so far) and not something that's really going to happen, but still... no comment. | |||
[[Special:Contributions/2A0E:410:9B22:0:6D78:8CFB:632E:E77E|2A0E:410:9B22:0:6D78:8CFB:632E:E77E]] 23:46, 29 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
:we have another factory reset threat here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pixel4a/comments/1idxaq1/force_factory_reset/ [[Special:Contributions/2A0E:410:9B22:0:18EC:935D:38F0:C10A|2A0E:410:9B22:0:18EC:935D:38F0:C10A]] | |||
==iFixit confirms the batteries they are currently selling have serial number "8230015901" (=good)== | |||
https://files.catbox.moe/bgggkk.png<br> | |||
This is probably worth adding to the main page under the "Replacing the battery" section, but I'll once again leave that for someone else to do probably.<br> | |||
In any case, the fact that Google knew all along which batteries were affected and which weren't, but didn't say anything about that, should also definitely be added to "criticism by community", it has caused massive headaches to repair shops which were replacing impacted batteries with other impacted ones, while google could've prevented all of this by just saying "hey, these serial numbers are the good batts, these ones are bad", just why??? | |||
[[Special:Contributions/2A0E:410:9B22:0:855E:A15A:9823:C36|2A0E:410:9B22:0:855E:A15A:9823:C36]] 16:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC) | |||
== Add how the update impacts the Pixel 4a == | |||
In the wiki we have *why* the update impact the Pixel 4a. However there's no *how*, like mentioning about voltage lowered from 4.4V to 3.95V, Consider add this and its source https://www.androidauthority.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/s5_batt_curve.png.webp [[User:Charlie 6|Charlie 6]] ([[User talk:Charlie 6|talk]]) 09:42, 6 April 2025 (UTC) |