Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
JazzyPizza (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary Tag: Manual revert |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. [[User:Mingyee|Mingyee]] ([[User talk:Mingyee|talk]]) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
------------- | |||
Some additional typos: | |||
2. The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article | |||
This should only lead to deletion if it's <- it is | |||
Aritcles <- Articles (inside categorization table) | |||
If a deletion request is determined to be valid, <- (missing comma) | |||
-- Comment by JazzyPizza, 25 April 2025 | |||
Thank you for pointing these out! and apologies for not actioning the earlier ones. I'll get everything done just now! | |||
[[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 22:39, 25 April 2025 (UTC) | |||