Talk:Activision Blizzard: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: Thursday at 08:45 by SinexTitan in topic Should the WoW data loss be mentioned?
→Should the WoW data loss be mentioned?: new section |
SinexTitan (talk | contribs) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Should the WoW data loss be mentioned? == | ==Should the WoW data loss be mentioned?== | ||
Otherwise dubbed the "Great Blizzard Bank Heist". I have unfortunately had first-hand experience with it (if anyone's read my main user page), but I'm unsure if it rises to being worthy of seeing inclusion in the main article. No one knows with certainty how many were affected by last year's fiasco, beyond the hundreds of users that either posted in the official Bug Report and/or General Discussion forums. Maybe not that many, maybe some don't know that they were, maybe Blizzard successfully pulled a "psyop" to keep reaction muted, or perhaps all three. | Otherwise dubbed the "Great Blizzard Bank Heist". I have unfortunately had first-hand experience with it (if anyone's read my main user page), but I'm unsure if it rises to being worthy of seeing inclusion in the main article. No one knows with certainty how many were affected by last year's fiasco, beyond the hundreds of users that either posted in the official Bug Report and/or General Discussion forums. Maybe not that many, maybe some don't know that they were, maybe Blizzard successfully pulled a "psyop" to keep reaction muted, or perhaps all three. | ||
Thought I should ask for a second opinion since I have a clear bias. -- [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 22:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC) | Thought I should ask for a second opinion since I have a clear bias. -- [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 22:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I since decided to create a section about this on the article page for ''[[World of Warcraft]]'' instead. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 03:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC) | |||
::as WoW is affiliated w Activision/Blizzard I feel it should be mentioned. But as you've already created a page for WoW, just writing a short incident report and linking to the page should be sufficient. [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 08:45, 3 July 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 08:45, 3 July 2025
Should the WoW data loss be mentioned?[edit source]
Otherwise dubbed the "Great Blizzard Bank Heist". I have unfortunately had first-hand experience with it (if anyone's read my main user page), but I'm unsure if it rises to being worthy of seeing inclusion in the main article. No one knows with certainty how many were affected by last year's fiasco, beyond the hundreds of users that either posted in the official Bug Report and/or General Discussion forums. Maybe not that many, maybe some don't know that they were, maybe Blizzard successfully pulled a "psyop" to keep reaction muted, or perhaps all three.
Thought I should ask for a second opinion since I have a clear bias. -- Sojourna (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- I since decided to create a section about this on the article page for World of Warcraft instead. — Sojourna (talk) 03:51, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
- as WoW is affiliated w Activision/Blizzard I feel it should be mentioned. But as you've already created a page for WoW, just writing a short incident report and linking to the page should be sufficient. SinexTitan (talk) 08:45, 3 July 2025 (UTC)