Jump to content

Robinhood Financial: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
DzLamme (talk | contribs)
128 edits
→Public sphere: Negative impacts
No edit summary
 
(13 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{StubNotice}}
{{InfoboxCompany
{{InfoboxCompany
|Name=Robinhood Financial, LLC|Type=Subsidiary|Founded=2013|Industry=Financial Services|Official Website=http://robinhood.com/|Logo=Robinhood (company) logo.svg}}
|Name=Robinhood Financial, LLC|Type=Subsidiary|Founded=2013|Industry=Financial Services|Official Website=http://robinhood.com/|Logo=Robinhood (company) logo.svg}}
==Background==
'''[[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Financial, LLC]],''' is a wholly-owned subsidiary of [[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Markets, Inc]]. The US app based brokerage company offers commission free stock and ETF trading ( exchange-traded funds ). Founded in 2013 by two former Stanford University room mates, the app was launched in 2015. Robinhood's mission is to democratize finance for all.


*Democratizing: Removing fees and simplifying investing for retail investors.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=DCF Team |first=The |title=Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) |url=https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/vision/hood-mission-vision |website=dcfmodeling.com}}</ref>
'''[[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Financial, LLC]],''' is a wholly-owned subsidiary of [[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Markets, Inc]]. The US app based brokerage company offers commission free stock and ETF trading ( exchange-traded funds ). Founded in 2013 by two former Stanford University room mates, the app was launched in 2015. Their mission is to democratize finance for all.
 
==Consumer impact summary==
 
===Mission statement===
*Democratizing: Removing fees and simplifying investing for individual investors.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=DCF Team |first=The |title=Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) |url=https://dcfmodeling.com/blogs/vision/hood-mission-vision |website=dcfmodeling.com}}</ref>


*Accessibility: Offering fractional shares, a mobile-first platform, and educational resources.<ref name=":0" />
*Accessibility: Offering fractional shares, a mobile-first platform, and educational resources.<ref name=":0" />
Line 12: Line 13:
*Inclusivity: Targeted young and less wealthy investors that historically were excluded from traditional brokerage services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Boorstin |first=Julia |date=May 25, 2021 |title=Robinhood’s disruptive force: The good, the bad and the controversy |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/25/robinhoods-disruptive-trade-the-good-the-bad-and-the-controversy.html |website=CNBC.com}}</ref>
*Inclusivity: Targeted young and less wealthy investors that historically were excluded from traditional brokerage services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Boorstin |first=Julia |date=May 25, 2021 |title=Robinhood’s disruptive force: The good, the bad and the controversy |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/25/robinhoods-disruptive-trade-the-good-the-bad-and-the-controversy.html |website=CNBC.com}}</ref>


==Public sphere==
===Business model===
Operates on a commission free trading model for individual investors. Generating revenue through:
 
*Payment for order flow (PFOF): Selling customer trades to high frequency trading firms earning rebates for each trade. This accounts for a significant percentage of its revenue.<ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=Goldfine |first=Jael |date=January 28, 2021 |title=Robinhood’s business model and backlash, explained |url=https://www.businessofbusiness.com/articles/robinhoods-business-model-and-backlash-explained/ |website=businessofbusiness.com}}</ref>
*Robinhood Gold: Subscription service offering margin trading and advanced feature for five dollars a month.<ref name=":5" />
*Interest on cash and securities lending: Earning from idle cash in user accounts and lending shares to short sellers.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Cabral |first=Sarah |last2=LaCombe |first2=Amy |date=December 1, 2021 |title=Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next? |url=https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/robinhood-reddit-and-gamestop-what-happened-and-what-should-happen-next/ |website=scu.edu}}</ref>
 
Critics argue that PFOF creates a conflict of interest, as they may prioritize routing orders to the highest paying  firms rather than ensuring the best execution for customers.
 
===Tokenized shares===
:Robinhood's shares are blockchain-based representations of traditional stocks or private equities. Tokens mirror the price movements of the underlying assets but do not confer legal ownership of the actual shares. Instead, they function as synthetic derivatives, offering exposure to the asset’s value without traditional shareholder rights like voting or dividends.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Harris |first=Ainsley |date=July 14, 2025 |title=What are ‘tokenized’ stocks, and why are trading platforms like Robinhood offering them? |url=https://www.fastcompany.com/91364041/tokenized-stok-trading-platforms-robinhood |website=Fast Company}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=O'Brient |first=Samuel |title=Robinhood has rolled out 'tokenized' stocks and ETFs. Here's what to know about the crypto-like assets. |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/what-is-tokenization-robinhood-openai-spacex-stocks-crypto-blockchain-hood-2025-7 |website=Business Insider}}</ref><ref name=":8">{{Cite web |last=Moukhtarzade |first=Darius |title=Turning Stocks into Tokens, Why its Cool but Complicated |url=https://www.21shares.com/en-us/research/turning-stocks-into-tokens-why-its-cool-but-complicated |website=21Shares}}</ref>
;Backing mechanism
:Actual shares are held in custody (for public stocks) or partners with brokers to back tokens with real securities. The tokens are synthetic claims tied to price performance, not equity for private companies.<ref name=":6" /><ref name=":8" /><ref name=":10">{{Cite web |title=Robinhood Faces Regulatory Scrutiny Over Tokenized Private Company Stock |url=https://www.ledgerinsights.com/robinhood-faces-regulatory-scrutiny-over-tokenized-private-company-stock/ |website=ledgerinsights.com}}</ref>
;Trading
:Tokenized shares trade 24 hours a day five days a week on Robinhood’s platform via Arbitrum, an Ethereum Layer-2 blockchain.<ref name=":9">{{Cite web |last=Patrick |first=Thompson |date=July 10, 2025 |title=Tokenized stocks explained: How Robinhood opened US markets |url=https://coingeek.com/tokenized-stocks-explained-how-robinhood-opened-us-markets/ |website=CoinGeek}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Mazza |first=Rosalia |date=July 5, 2025 |title=Robinhood Tokenization Push Redefines Market Hours and Investor Access |url=https://www.fintechweekly.com/magazine/articles/robinhood-tokenization-stock-trading-eu-arbitrum |website=FinTech Weekly}}</ref>
;Access
:Currently available only to EU users, these tokens allow fractional ownership and bypass cross-border brokerage hurdles.<ref name=":7" /><ref name=":9" />
;Regulatory status
:Classified as derivatives under EU rules, not direct securities. Robinhood emphasizes transparency, but faces scrutiny over disclosures involving private companies.<ref name=":10" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Fenton |first=Andrew |date=July 16, 2025 |title=Will Robinhood’s tokenized stocks REALLY take over the world? |url=https://cointelegraph.com/magazine/tokenized-stocks-take-over-world-robinhood-kraken-pros-cons-crypto/ |website=cointelegraph.com}}</ref>
===Negative impacts===
 
====Misleading Practices and Lack of Transparency====
*Fined $65 million by the SEC in 2020 for failing to disclose how PFOF led to inferior trade execution prices, costing customers $34.1 million in aggregate. The platform claimed trades were "commission-free" but hid the true costs.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fitzgerald |first=Maggie |date=December 17, 2020 |title=SEC charges Robinhood with misleading customers about how it makes money |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/17/sec-charges-robinhood-with-misleading-customers-about-how-it-makes-money.html |website=CNBC.com}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |date=December 17, 2020 |title=SEC Charges Robinhood Financial With Misleading Customers About Revenue Sources and Failing to Satisfy Duty of Best Execution |url=https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020-321 |website=SEC.gov}}</ref>


=== Negative impacts and controversies ===
*Massachusetts regulators fined Robinhood $7.5 million in 2024 for using deceptive gamification tactics (e.g., digital confetti, scratch-off stock rewards) that encouraged risky trading without adequate investor protections.<ref name=":2">{{Cite web |last=Hill |first=Paul |date=February 12, 2024 |title=Game Over: Robinhood Pays $7.5 Million to Resolve “Gamification” Securities Violations |url=https://www.velaw.com/insights/game-over-robinhood-pays-7-5-million-to-resolve-gamification-securities-violations/ |website=velaw.com}}</ref>


==== Misleading Practices and Lack of Transparency ====
=====Systemic Compliance Failures=====
Fined $65 million by the SEC in 2020 for failing to disclose how payment for order flow (PFOF) led to inferior trade execution prices, costing customers $34.1 million in aggregate. The platform claimed trades were "commission-free" but hid the true costs.
*Paid $29.75 million in 2025 to settle the Finance Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) probes for failing to detect suspicious account activity, leaving customers vulnerable to hacking and fraud.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=March 7, 2025 |title=Robinhood paying $29.75 million to end US regulator's probes |url=https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/robinhood-paying-2975-million-end-us-regulators-probes-2025-03-07/ |website=Reuters.com}}</ref>


Massachusetts regulators fined Robinhood $7.5 million in 2024 for using deceptive gamification tactics (e.g., digital confetti, scratch-off stock rewards) that encouraged risky trading without adequate investor protections.
*Fined $45 million in 2025 by the SEC for failing to safeguard customer data, leading to a 2021 breach exposing millions of users’ information.<ref>{{Cite web |date=January 13, 2025 |title=Two Robinhood Broker-Dealers to Pay $45 Million in Combined Penalties for Violating More Than 10 Separate Securities Law Provisions |url=https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-5 |website=SEC.gov}}</ref>


===== Systemic Compliance Failures =====
=====Restricting Consumer Choice=====
Paid $29.75 million in 2025 to settle the Finance Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) probes for failing to detect suspicious account activity, leaving customers vulnerable to hacking and fraud.
*During the 2021 they abruptly halted trading in meme stocks, citing clearinghouse deposit requirements. This left individual investors unable to capitalize on market movements while institutional traders faced fewer restrictions. Critics argued this violated consumer rights by favoring systemic stability over fair access.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Orcutt |first=Johnathan |date=February 25, 2021 |title=The Legal Impact: Robinhood |url=https://law.unh.edu/blog/2021/02/legal-impact-robinhood |website=unh.edu}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cabral |first=Sarah |last2=LaCombe |first2=Amy |date=December 1, 2021 |title=Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next? |url=https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/robinhood-reddit-and-gamestop-what-happened-and-what-should-happen-next/ |website=scu.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Goodman |first=Lawrence |last2=Lofchie |first2=Steven |last3=Lumsdaine |first3=Robin |date=February 23, 2021 |title=Robinhood and GameStop: Essential Issues and Next Steps for Regulators and Investors |url=https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/23/robinhood-and-gamestop-essential-issues-and-next-steps-for-regulators-and-investors/ |website=harvard.edu}}</ref>


Fined $45 million in 2025 by the SEC for failing to safeguard customer data, leading to a 2021 breach exposing millions of users’ information.
=====Exploitation of Inexperienced Investors=====
*Robinhood’s reliance on financial influencers (finfluencers) led to a $26 million FINRA fine in 2025 for failing to supervise misleading promotions (e.g., claims of "living financially free" from dividends).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Powell |first=Robin |date=March 24, 2025 |title=Robinhood Case Highlights Risks Posed by Finfluencers |url=https://www.ifa.com/articles/robinhood_case_highlights_risks_posed_finfluencers |website=ifa.com}}</ref>


===== Restricting Consumer Choice =====
*The platform’s design prioritized engagement over fiduciary duty, pushing users toward frequent trading, a practice Massachusetts deemed a violation of its fiduciary rule.<ref name=":2" />
During the 2021 GameStop short squeeze, Robinhood abruptly halted trading in meme stocks, citing clearinghouse deposit requirements. This left retail investors unable to capitalize on market movements while institutional traders faced fewer restrictions. Critics argued this violated consumer rights by favoring systemic stability over fair access.


===== Exploitation of Inexperienced Investors =====
===Ongoing ethical and regulatory concerns===
Robinhood’s reliance on financial influencers (finfluencers) led to a $26 million FINRA fine in 2025 for failing to supervise misleading promotions (e.g., claims of "living financially free" from dividends).


The platform’s design prioritized engagement over fiduciary duty, pushing users toward frequent trading, a practice Massachusetts deemed a violation of its fiduciary rule.
====Conflicts of Interest====
Robinhood’s revenue model (e.g., PFOF, stock lending) often misaligned with customer best execution rights.<ref name=":1" /><ref name=":4" />


=== Ongoing ethical and regulatory concerns ===
====Arbitration Clauses====
Users are forced into mandatory arbitration, limiting their ability to seek legal redress.<ref name=":3" />


==== Conflicts of Interest ====
==Incidents==
Robinhood’s revenue model (PFOF, stock lending) often misaligned with customer best execution rights.


==== Arbitration Clauses ====
===Death of a trader===
Users are forced into mandatory arbitration, limiting their ability to seek legal redress.
In 2020 a user committed suicide after misinterpreted a negative balance due to poor UI design, leading to backlash over risk disclosures.


===January 2021 restrictions on customer trading===
===GameStop short squeeze===
On January 28, 2021, Robinhood systems restricted customer trading in certain securities for companies with heightened stock volatility,<ref>{{Cite web |date=28 Jan 2021 |title=Keeping Customers Informed Through Market Volatility |url=https://newsroom.aboutrobinhood.com/keeping-customers-informed-through-market-volatility/ |url-status=live |access-date=5 Apr 2025 |website=[[Robinhood]]}}</ref> including [[GameStop]],<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fitzgerald |first=Maggie |date=28 Jan 2021 |title=Robinhood restricts trading in GameStop, other names involved in frenzy |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/robinhood-interactive-brokers-restrict-trading-in-gamestop-s.html |url-status=live |access-date=5 Apr 2025 |website=CNBC}}</ref> AMC Entertainment, and Bed Bath and Beyond. CNBC reported that the brokerage firm [[Interactive Brokers|Interactive Brokers (IB)]] also imposed trading restrictions on the same day.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Fitzgerald |first=Maggie |date=28 Jan 2021 |title=Interactive Brokers restricted GameStop trading to protect the market, says Chairman Peterffy |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/interactive-brokers-restricted-gamestop-trading-to-protect-the-market-says-chairman-peterffy.html |url-status=live |access-date=5 Apr 2025 |website=CNBC}}</ref> Additionally, CNBC noted that other brokerages, such as [[TD Ameritrade]] and [[Charles Schwab]], had increased margin requirements the day before—a move described as less 'drastic' compared to outright trading halts.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Stevens |first=Pippa |date=28 Jan 2021 |title=GameStop shares jump 68% on Friday, bringing gains for the week to 400% |url=https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/robinhood-will-allow-limited-buying-of-restricted-securities-friday-gamestop-jumps-after-hours.html |url-status=live |access-date=5 Apr 2025 |website=CNBC}}</ref>
''main article: [[GameStop Short Squeeze]]''


Customers should be aware that brokerages, including Robinhood, may take similar actions in the future. This poses a risk of economic harm, as investors could be artificially prevented from entering or executing trades during critical market movements.
In 2021, decisions to restrict trading fueled accusations of market manipulation and hypocrisy due to it's 'for the people' branding.


==References==
==References==

Latest revision as of 16:33, 26 July 2025

Robinhood Financial
Basic information
Founded 2013
Legal structure Subsidiary
Industry Financial Services
Official website http://robinhood.com/


Robinhood Financial, LLC, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Robinhood Markets, Inc. The US app based brokerage company offers commission free stock and ETF trading ( exchange-traded funds ). Founded in 2013 by two former Stanford University room mates, the app was launched in 2015. Their mission is to democratize finance for all.

Consumer impact summary[edit | edit source]

Mission statement[edit | edit source]

  • Democratizing: Removing fees and simplifying investing for individual investors.[1]
  • Accessibility: Offering fractional shares, a mobile-first platform, and educational resources.[1]
  • Inclusivity: Targeted young and less wealthy investors that historically were excluded from traditional brokerage services.[2]

Business model[edit | edit source]

Operates on a commission free trading model for individual investors. Generating revenue through:

  • Payment for order flow (PFOF): Selling customer trades to high frequency trading firms earning rebates for each trade. This accounts for a significant percentage of its revenue.[3]
  • Robinhood Gold: Subscription service offering margin trading and advanced feature for five dollars a month.[3]
  • Interest on cash and securities lending: Earning from idle cash in user accounts and lending shares to short sellers.[4]

Critics argue that PFOF creates a conflict of interest, as they may prioritize routing orders to the highest paying firms rather than ensuring the best execution for customers.

Tokenized shares[edit | edit source]

Robinhood's shares are blockchain-based representations of traditional stocks or private equities. Tokens mirror the price movements of the underlying assets but do not confer legal ownership of the actual shares. Instead, they function as synthetic derivatives, offering exposure to the asset’s value without traditional shareholder rights like voting or dividends.[5][6][7]
Backing mechanism
Actual shares are held in custody (for public stocks) or partners with brokers to back tokens with real securities. The tokens are synthetic claims tied to price performance, not equity for private companies.[5][7][8]
Trading
Tokenized shares trade 24 hours a day five days a week on Robinhood’s platform via Arbitrum, an Ethereum Layer-2 blockchain.[9][10]
Access
Currently available only to EU users, these tokens allow fractional ownership and bypass cross-border brokerage hurdles.[6][9]
Regulatory status
Classified as derivatives under EU rules, not direct securities. Robinhood emphasizes transparency, but faces scrutiny over disclosures involving private companies.[8][11]

Negative impacts[edit | edit source]

Misleading Practices and Lack of Transparency[edit | edit source]

  • Fined $65 million by the SEC in 2020 for failing to disclose how PFOF led to inferior trade execution prices, costing customers $34.1 million in aggregate. The platform claimed trades were "commission-free" but hid the true costs.[12][13]
  • Massachusetts regulators fined Robinhood $7.5 million in 2024 for using deceptive gamification tactics (e.g., digital confetti, scratch-off stock rewards) that encouraged risky trading without adequate investor protections.[14]
Systemic Compliance Failures[edit | edit source]
  • Paid $29.75 million in 2025 to settle the Finance Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) probes for failing to detect suspicious account activity, leaving customers vulnerable to hacking and fraud.[15]
  • Fined $45 million in 2025 by the SEC for failing to safeguard customer data, leading to a 2021 breach exposing millions of users’ information.[16]
Restricting Consumer Choice[edit | edit source]
  • During the 2021 they abruptly halted trading in meme stocks, citing clearinghouse deposit requirements. This left individual investors unable to capitalize on market movements while institutional traders faced fewer restrictions. Critics argued this violated consumer rights by favoring systemic stability over fair access.[17][18][19]
Exploitation of Inexperienced Investors[edit | edit source]
  • Robinhood’s reliance on financial influencers (finfluencers) led to a $26 million FINRA fine in 2025 for failing to supervise misleading promotions (e.g., claims of "living financially free" from dividends).[20]
  • The platform’s design prioritized engagement over fiduciary duty, pushing users toward frequent trading, a practice Massachusetts deemed a violation of its fiduciary rule.[14]

Ongoing ethical and regulatory concerns[edit | edit source]

Conflicts of Interest[edit | edit source]

Robinhood’s revenue model (e.g., PFOF, stock lending) often misaligned with customer best execution rights.[13][18]

Arbitration Clauses[edit | edit source]

Users are forced into mandatory arbitration, limiting their ability to seek legal redress.[17]

Incidents[edit | edit source]

Death of a trader[edit | edit source]

In 2020 a user committed suicide after misinterpreted a negative balance due to poor UI design, leading to backlash over risk disclosures.

GameStop short squeeze[edit | edit source]

main article: GameStop Short Squeeze

In 2021, decisions to restrict trading fueled accusations of market manipulation and hypocrisy due to it's 'for the people' branding.

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 DCF Team, The. "Mission Statement, Vision, & Core Values of Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD)". dcfmodeling.com.
  2. ↑ Boorstin, Julia (May 25, 2021). "Robinhood's disruptive force: The good, the bad and the controversy". CNBC.com.
  3. ↑ 3.0 3.1 Goldfine, Jael (January 28, 2021). "Robinhood's business model and backlash, explained". businessofbusiness.com.
  4. ↑ Cabral, Sarah; LaCombe, Amy (December 1, 2021). "Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next?". scu.edu.
  5. ↑ 5.0 5.1 Harris, Ainsley (July 14, 2025). "What are 'tokenized' stocks, and why are trading platforms like Robinhood offering them?". Fast Company.
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 O'Brient, Samuel. "Robinhood has rolled out 'tokenized' stocks and ETFs. Here's what to know about the crypto-like assets". Business Insider.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 Moukhtarzade, Darius. "Turning Stocks into Tokens, Why its Cool but Complicated". 21Shares.
  8. ↑ 8.0 8.1 "Robinhood Faces Regulatory Scrutiny Over Tokenized Private Company Stock". ledgerinsights.com.
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 Patrick, Thompson (July 10, 2025). "Tokenized stocks explained: How Robinhood opened US markets". CoinGeek.
  10. ↑ Mazza, Rosalia (July 5, 2025). "Robinhood Tokenization Push Redefines Market Hours and Investor Access". FinTech Weekly.
  11. ↑ Fenton, Andrew (July 16, 2025). "Will Robinhood's tokenized stocks REALLY take over the world?". cointelegraph.com.
  12. ↑ Fitzgerald, Maggie (December 17, 2020). "SEC charges Robinhood with misleading customers about how it makes money". CNBC.com.
  13. ↑ 13.0 13.1 "SEC Charges Robinhood Financial With Misleading Customers About Revenue Sources and Failing to Satisfy Duty of Best Execution". SEC.gov. December 17, 2020.
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 Hill, Paul (February 12, 2024). "Game Over: Robinhood Pays $7.5 Million to Resolve "Gamification" Securities Violations". velaw.com.
  15. ↑ Stempel, Jonathan (March 7, 2025). "Robinhood paying $29.75 million to end US regulator's probes". Reuters.com.
  16. ↑ "Two Robinhood Broker-Dealers to Pay $45 Million in Combined Penalties for Violating More Than 10 Separate Securities Law Provisions". SEC.gov. January 13, 2025.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Orcutt, Johnathan (February 25, 2021). "The Legal Impact: Robinhood". unh.edu.
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 Cabral, Sarah; LaCombe, Amy (December 1, 2021). "Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next?". scu.edu.
  19. ↑ Goodman, Lawrence; Lofchie, Steven; Lumsdaine, Robin (February 23, 2021). "Robinhood and GameStop: Essential Issues and Next Steps for Regulators and Investors". harvard.edu.
  20. ↑ Powell, Robin (March 24, 2025). "Robinhood Case Highlights Risks Posed by Finfluencers". ifa.com.
Retrieved from "https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Robinhood_Financial&oldid=17822"