Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 6 March by Kostas in topic Brother refutes saying these are false claims
→Brother refutes saying these are false claims: new section |
m Keith moved page Talk:Brother ink lockout & quality sabotage to Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: changed title for tone reasons. Maybe someone can think of a better one, but wanted to get the work 'sabotage' out |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]] | [[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]] | ||
:Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:24, 17 August 2025
Brother refutes saying these are false claims[edit source]
Brother claims this is false. I wonder whether they will fix firmware that confirms it's actually true? Hacker News discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43271507
2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582
- Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. Kostas (talk) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC)