Talk:Collective Shout: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: Yesterday at 07:06 by JamesTDG in topic Relevancy to CRW
→Relevancy to CRW: new section |
→Relevancy to CRW: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevancy to CRW == | ==Relevancy to CRW== | ||
I would argue that the article is relevant here due to the activist group having a history of attempting to or preemptively blocking customers' ability to otherwise engage in lawful transactions because CS finds something offensive. The ability to obtain something ought to be taken into consideration, even though it might not be nearly as important to the focus of this wiki as having said thing and then having it altered in an anti-consumer manner. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 05:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC) | I would argue that the article is relevant here due to the activist group having a history of attempting to or preemptively blocking customers' ability to otherwise engage in lawful transactions because CS finds something offensive. The ability to obtain something ought to be taken into consideration, even though it might not be nearly as important to the focus of this wiki as having said thing and then having it altered in an anti-consumer manner. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 05:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Agreed, their tantrums towards payment processors should be evidence enough to say that their actions are harming consumers. Their actions have been responsible for developers on itch.io and Steam to not get paid in general [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 07:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:06, 4 September 2025
Relevancy to CRW
I would argue that the article is relevant here due to the activist group having a history of attempting to or preemptively blocking customers' ability to otherwise engage in lawful transactions because CS finds something offensive. The ability to obtain something ought to be taken into consideration, even though it might not be nearly as important to the focus of this wiki as having said thing and then having it altered in an anti-consumer manner. — Sojourna (talk) 05:38, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed, their tantrums towards payment processors should be evidence enough to say that their actions are harming consumers. Their actions have been responsible for developers on itch.io and Steam to not get paid in general JamesTDG (talk) 07:06, 4 September 2025 (UTC)