Talk:CF Moto puts previously included features behind paywall: Difference between revisions
Add topicAppearance
Latest comment: 4 September by AnotherConsumerRightsPerson in topic Do we need some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category for this incident?
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Discussion == | ==Discussion== | ||
Things we need: | Things we need: | ||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Communications with distributors [[User:Vleisbom|Vleisbom]] ([[User talk:Vleisbom|talk]]) 07:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | Communications with distributors [[User:Vleisbom|Vleisbom]] ([[User talk:Vleisbom|talk]]) 07:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Do we need some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category for this incident? == | ==Do we need some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category for this incident?== | ||
Looking at the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsoLdrcpFy0 Louis corrects CFMOTO misinformation; here's what really happened video], I'm wondering if we need to have some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category, to document instances where instead of companies admitting they did something the consumers didn't like and reversing their anti-ownership policy, they pretend that the policy never existed. [[User:Big Mac|Big Mac]] ([[User talk:Big Mac|talk]]) 06:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC) | Looking at the [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsoLdrcpFy0 Louis corrects CFMOTO misinformation; here's what really happened video], I'm wondering if we need to have some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category, to document instances where instead of companies admitting they did something the consumers didn't like and reversing their anti-ownership policy, they pretend that the policy never existed. [[User:Big Mac|Big Mac]] ([[User talk:Big Mac|talk]]) 06:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:When I edited this before, I didn’t think of adding this, and I was the only person who edited today, so info about that video hasn’t been added yet. I hope we can implement it somehow in the wiki as it seems to be a great idea and I do like it. I’m not a mod and I probably won’t create it myself, but I hope it happens in some form. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 15:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 15:14, 4 September 2025
Discussion
[edit source]Things we need:
Screenshots and links to all locations that expresses that there is no subscription (before they get updated)
Communications with distributors Vleisbom (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
Do we need some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category for this incident?
[edit source]Looking at the Louis corrects CFMOTO misinformation; here's what really happened video, I'm wondering if we need to have some sort of "gaslighting rollback" category, to document instances where instead of companies admitting they did something the consumers didn't like and reversing their anti-ownership policy, they pretend that the policy never existed. Big Mac (talk) 06:41, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- When I edited this before, I didn’t think of adding this, and I was the only person who edited today, so info about that video hasn’t been added yet. I hope we can implement it somehow in the wiki as it seems to be a great idea and I do like it. I’m not a mod and I probably won’t create it myself, but I hope it happens in some form. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 15:14, 4 September 2025 (UTC)