Talk:Disney+ Household Restrictions & Access Limitations: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 05:37 by AnotherConsumerRightsPerson in topic Irrelevant
→Irrelevant: new section |
→Irrelevant: Reply |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Irrelevant == | ==Irrelevant== | ||
Hello, I put a relevance notice here as this page seems to have no references that link somewhere, therefore making it unclear whether it fits the [[Mission statement]] and [[Project:Inclusion guidelines|Inclusion guidelines]], and also just not really fitting the purpose of the wiki in general, just not seeming to deserve an article on. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 19:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | Hello, I put a relevance notice here as this page seems to have no references that link somewhere, therefore making it unclear whether it fits the [[Mission statement]] and [[Project:Inclusion guidelines|Inclusion guidelines]], and also just not really fitting the purpose of the wiki in general, just not seeming to deserve an article on. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 19:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I think it is relevant and the article is valid. Cracking down on password sharing is a big thing with streaming services and leads to a lot of gaps and bad practice. The referencing in this article, though, is not well done at all. A simple internet search could probably bring up the exact reddit thread that's being referenced, or perhaps other sources that are still valid. There's also tone/NPOV issues that need to be fixed. But either way, I think the article can be salvaged. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 21:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
::Here are sources I have found: [https://variety.com/2024/digital/news/disney-launches-password-sharing-crackdown-extra-member-1236155793/] [https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/disney-plus-password-sharing-crackdown-begins-paid-sharing-1236011760/] [https://allaboutcookies.org/bypass-disney-password-sharing-ban] [https://www.techradar.com/news/disney-plus-password-sharing] [https://thewaltdisneycompany.com/paid-sharing-disney-explainer/] [https://www.cbc.ca/news/business/disney-plus-passwords-1.7163374] [https://www.theverge.com/2023/9/27/23893231/disney-plus-password-sharing-ban-canada] [https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/hulu-disney-password-crackdown-kills-account-sharing-on-march-14/] [https://www.androidauthority.com/disney-plus-paid-account-sharing-prices-3485137/] [https://help.disneyplus.com/article/disneyplus-subscription-sharing] [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 00:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::Rereading this I think I just didn’t get the point of the article at all and I only saw there were almost no references with links and all were on Reddit and immediately thought it was irrelevant. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 05:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 05:37, 14 September 2025
Irrelevant[edit source]
Hello, I put a relevance notice here as this page seems to have no references that link somewhere, therefore making it unclear whether it fits the Mission statement and Inclusion guidelines, and also just not really fitting the purpose of the wiki in general, just not seeming to deserve an article on. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 19:48, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- I think it is relevant and the article is valid. Cracking down on password sharing is a big thing with streaming services and leads to a lot of gaps and bad practice. The referencing in this article, though, is not well done at all. A simple internet search could probably bring up the exact reddit thread that's being referenced, or perhaps other sources that are still valid. There's also tone/NPOV issues that need to be fixed. But either way, I think the article can be salvaged. Beanie Bo (talk) 21:53, 13 September 2025 (UTC)
- Here are sources I have found: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Mr Pollo (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Rereading this I think I just didn’t get the point of the article at all and I only saw there were almost no references with links and all were on Reddit and immediately thought it was irrelevant. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 05:37, 14 September 2025 (UTC)
- Here are sources I have found: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] Mr Pollo (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2025 (UTC)