Jump to content

User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson/Bad Articles: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Hello. This is a self-made <b>unofficial</b> page that is used for when I see bad articles that I can’t just immediately fix. You can use this too, but I might just make mistakes when flagging up pages, so be careful of that.
Hello. This is a self-made <b>unofficial</b> page that is used for when I see bad articles that I can’t just immediately fix. You can use this too, but I might just make mistakes when flagging up pages, so be careful of that. Below is how I rate articles to put on here (these are mostly guiding rules):
Below is how I rate articles to put on here (these are mostly guiding rules):
*Does it have a stub/incomplete/SloppyAI notice?
*Does it have a stub/incomplete/SloppyAI notice?
*Has it had any major edits in a long time?
*Has it had any major edits in a long time?
Line 39: Line 38:
*[[Maryland Attorney General]]
*[[Maryland Attorney General]]
*[[Pixel 4a]]
*[[Pixel 4a]]
*[[Vizio fined by the FTC for collecting and selling user data without consumer consent]]

Revision as of 15:42, 15 September 2025

Hello. This is a self-made unofficial page that is used for when I see bad articles that I can’t just immediately fix. You can use this too, but I might just make mistakes when flagging up pages, so be careful of that. Below is how I rate articles to put on here (these are mostly guiding rules):

  • Does it have a stub/incomplete/SloppyAI notice?
  • Has it had any major edits in a long time?
  • Does it use basic rules? (NPOV, using templates, etc)
  • Does it have a deletion request? If it does, ignore most of the time.
  • Does it have references?

The bad articles