Beanie Bo (talk | contribs)
Relevance: Reply
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Points of additional research ==
==Points of additional research==


GOG giving free copies of STALKER to people who were affected by GameSpy
GOG giving free copies of STALKER to people who were affected by GameSpy
Line 48: Line 48:


https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/22ljrh/after_the_annoucement_of_the_gamespy_shutdown/ [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
https://www.reddit.com/r/Games/comments/22ljrh/after_the_annoucement_of_the_gamespy_shutdown/ [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:17, 8 July 2025 (UTC)
==Relevance==
So, we should probably discuss the relevance mark, since the GameSpy shutdown hurt ownership on a massive scale, and it was not because GS was unable to afford it, but rather the company that bought their server infra decided to just shut it all down [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 09:38, 1 October 2025 (UTC)
:So why is the relevance questioned?  It seems like a classic example of the sort of new consumer issue the wiki is intended for.  [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
::Another member of our staff applied the mark without discussing why it deserved the mark. I still have no awareness as to why they were thinking this. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 03:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
:::I think this article needs a stub (or incomplete notice). The consumer response is somewhat critical to this issue but is very lacking here [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 13:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)