Relevance: Reply
Beanie Bo (talk | contribs)
Relevance: Reply
 
Line 55: Line 55:
:So why is the relevance questioned?  It seems like a classic example of the sort of new consumer issue the wiki is intended for.  [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
:So why is the relevance questioned?  It seems like a classic example of the sort of new consumer issue the wiki is intended for.  [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:36, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
::Another member of our staff applied the mark without discussing why it deserved the mark. I still have no awareness as to why they were thinking this. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 03:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
::Another member of our staff applied the mark without discussing why it deserved the mark. I still have no awareness as to why they were thinking this. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 03:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
:::I think this article needs a stub (or incomplete notice). The consumer response is somewhat critical to this issue but is very lacking here [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 13:41, 25 October 2025 (UTC)