Talk:Google Gemini: Difference between revisions

:::For example, ChatGPT has similar issues for inducing delusional disorders, misleading, etc.  However it is not (as far as I know) integrated with Gmail, or Google docs, or Google search, or Googles other ubiquitous products.  So, while Gemini shares the same underlying security problems as all LLMs, the impact of these problems in Gemini is greater because of the products reach, and more specific to users of Google products.  I tried to say that in the post blow (which predates this discussion), was that unclear, or ??? [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 17:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

::::My apologies for being curt. It's just that there are no specific incidents related to Gemini having consumer issues (as opposed to LLM's in general), which is why someone added the relevance notice. Company articles usually have at least one relevant incident as a stub, otherwise they get deleted. So I mentioned you in case you had something to add before it does [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 21:49, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

:Google says they will not be fixing One of the attack types (ASCII injection) mentioned in article above about prompt injection.  (One that is actually fixable.)  ''Google won’t fix ‘ASCII smuggling’ hack in Gemini AI''  [[https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/10/11/google-wont-fix-ascii-smuggling-hack-in-gemini-ai/]]

:Gemini is pretty much anywhere you find Google apps, so the targets are plentiful, and Google is going to keep 'em nice and vulnerable.  Not good for consumers.  [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)