Talk:Healthline: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)

Line 15:

:with regards to misinformation, we need to be citing experts who are calling them out for being inaccurate, not joining those dots ourselves.

:but yeah, i'd say that the main issue here is a lack of secondary sources, rather than a relevance issue. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 23:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

::ah I didn't consider that lol. CRW's the first time I've done anything like this so am still learning new stuff.

::anyhow, they do not explicitly mention using AI for generation. they state "In some cases, Artificial Intelligence (AI), or similar technology, may be used in developing elements of our content." due to the vagueness of that statement it could contain generation but atm I have no receipts. the usage of accelerating certain tedious workflows is fine by me. but based on the current state of AI I feel we must be cautious. for me the inclusion is context. for those actually making a decision regarding Healthline to have in the back of their mind. some people despise AI and I can't blame them for it. hence when they see "this product uses AI" they might take their "business" (couldn't find a better word lmao) elsewhere.

::one of the things that really bug me is '''the''' lack of expert review lol. when searching anything medical related Healthline's like the top results in the first page. the site also generates a fuckton of traffic yet nothing holding them accountable than volunteers on Wikipedia and CRW? damn shit fucked af

::anyway nothing for us to do than our work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 09:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

:::I agree that AI in its current state is increasing becoming an unwanted mainstay in our society and lives among the general public (I myself am getting AI fatigue). Though like what Keith said, the wiki would need sources from experts debunking those Healthline articles and not an unqualified entity like the wiki debunking them (only reporting on the debunking by qualified professionals). [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 22:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 :with regards to misinformation, we need to be citing experts who are calling them out for being inaccurate, not joining those dots ourselves.
 :but yeah, i'd say that the main issue here is a lack of secondary sources, rather than a relevance issue. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 23:50, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
+::ah I didn't consider that lol. CRW's the first time I've done anything like this so am still learning new stuff.
+::anyhow, they do not explicitly mention using AI for generation. they state "In some cases, Artificial Intelligence (AI), or similar technology, may be used in developing elements of our content." due to the vagueness of that statement it could contain generation but atm I have no receipts. the usage of accelerating certain tedious workflows is fine by me. but based on the current state of AI I feel we must be cautious. for me the inclusion is context. for those actually making a decision regarding Healthline to have in the back of their mind. some people despise AI and I can't blame them for it. hence when they see "this product uses AI" they might take their "business" (couldn't find a better word lmao) elsewhere.
+::one of the things that really bug me is '''the''' lack of expert review lol. when searching anything medical related Healthline's like the top results in the first page. the site also generates a fuckton of traffic yet nothing holding them accountable than volunteers on Wikipedia and CRW? damn shit fucked af
+::anyway nothing for us to do than our work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 09:42, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
+:::I agree that AI in its current state is increasing becoming an unwanted mainstay in our society and lives among the general public (I myself am getting AI fatigue). Though like what Keith said, the wiki would need sources from experts debunking those Healthline articles and not an unqualified entity like the wiki debunking them (only reporting on the debunking by qualified professionals). [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 22:36, 24 January 2026 (UTC)