Talk:UK Mandatory Digital ID Rollout for Employment 2025: Difference between revisions
→Relevancy discussion: Reply |
→Relevancy discussion: Reply |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::I think this is still creeping too far into civil rights territory. it's very important, but just not within the wiki's scope. | ::I think this is still creeping too far into civil rights territory. it's very important, but just not within the wiki's scope. | ||
::if we applied the 'everyone is a consumer' logic you use there, then suddenly literally everything becomes relevant to the wiki. I don't want articles about voter ID or ICE or freedom of speech laws or whatever starting to flood the wiki. Do we start a series of articles on North Korea's societal repression too? Eritrea? Are the massacres of the Sudanese civil war relevant because the people who died were consumers? it just seems like it's past the line of what's in-scope. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 09:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC) | ::if we applied the 'everyone is a consumer' logic you use there, then suddenly literally everything becomes relevant to the wiki. I don't want articles about voter ID or ICE or freedom of speech laws or whatever starting to flood the wiki. Do we start a series of articles on North Korea's societal repression too? Eritrea? Are the massacres of the Sudanese civil war relevant because the people who died were consumers? it just seems like it's past the line of what's in-scope. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 09:41, 18 December 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::I agree. This article topic is too generalized to be relevant to CRW. The SloppyAI tag also doesn't help its case, either. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 22:35, 25 January 2026 (UTC) | |||