Raster (talk | contribs)
m Raster's bookmarks: add sourcing & SP:newpages
Raster (talk | contribs)
m Raster's tone scratchpad: add Keith reply
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
These are here for the inevitable time I change browsers and refuse to import data for the 29th time
These are here for the inevitable time I change browsers and refuse to import data for the 29th time


[[Consumer Rights Wiki:Task Center|Task Centre]] | [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Editorial guidelines#Use of tone|Guidelines]] (tone) | [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Verifiability|Saucing]] (source credibility) | [[Mission statement|Mission]] | (to-dos) [[:Category:Articles requiring change in tone|Tone]] | [[User:Raster/Sandbox|my drafts]] | [[Special:NewPages|News]] (New Pages)
[[Projects:Archive everything|P:AE]] | [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Task Center|Task Centre]] | [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Editorial guidelines#Use of tone|Guidelines]] (tone) | [[Consumer Rights Wiki:Verifiability|Saucing]] (source credibility) | [[Mission statement|Mission]] | (to-dos) [[:Category:Articles requiring change in tone|Tone]] | [[User:Raster/Sandbox|my drafts]] | [[Special:NewPages|News]] (New Pages)
 
==Raster's tone scratchpad==
Some pages have a tone notice but are too long to easily spot where it was added (without checking the History). This is where I note some of them down, so I hopefully don't use up energy just trying to find '''where''' the tone should be changed
 
[[Discord]] - "Tone notice. Article is overly aggressive for a company page and relies heavily on bullet point summaries instead of '''describing the TOS/Privacy Policy'''" - Beanie Bo 2025 (bold mine)
 
> within [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard#c-Keith-20260301004200-Raster-20260228051100|Mod noticeboard]]: "
 
: I think as you say the main issues relate to the bullet pointed sections; mainly there are phrases like 'broad rights', which are both unhelpful and potentially misleading depending on how the reader interprets it. I'd say a shortening of the consumer impact summary, and the addition of a full section on its terms of service is probably sensible.
: I also removed the section on vague moderation as it really didn't have good enough citations to support its inclusion.
: I do think it's in a decent enough state to probably not need the tone warning however, and so I've taken it off." - Keith