Talk:Right to own: Difference between revisions

(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 2:

If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is. [[User:Webmistress|Webmistress]] ([[(User talk: Webmistress|talk]]) 05:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

:I started expanding on the definition of the problem and got a little carried away, in the end rewriting almost the whole thing, using prior revision as scaffolding. I left the red links in the security section be.

:Would appreciate a review of the new revision to see if I kept the intent and the scope in line with the article's purpose.

:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

==Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?==

Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away.

I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

:That could work. I've created it as a redirect. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 17:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 If my changes are still here and are considered useful, that is. [[User:Webmistress|Webmistress]] ([[(User talk: Webmistress|talk]]) 05:38, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
+:I started expanding on the definition of the problem and got a little carried away, in the end rewriting almost the whole thing, using prior revision as scaffolding. I left the red links in the security section be.
+:Would appreciate a review of the new revision to see if I kept the intent and the scope in line with the article's purpose.
+:Particularly, the new classification of ownership issues I established there seems a little blurry on the edges between them, but that seems to be inevitable, since they're kinda related. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:13, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
+==Rename to "Erosion of ownership"?==
+Looking up "right to ownership" and "right to own" seems to commonly bring up the legal concept of "right to property". While absolutely related, it's a little too wide, the subject of the article is more about that ownership being subtly taken away.
+I've added 3 citations that mention "erosion of ownership" in the same sense, and after fleshing out the "Common issues" section I started wondering if that should actually be the article's title, since that wording in particular seems to be more widespread in association with what's being discussed in the article. [[User:D-side|D-side]] ([[User talk:D-side|talk]]) 16:19, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
+:That could work. I've created it as a redirect. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 17:00, 14 March 2026 (UTC)