Talk:Valve removes arbitration requirement from Steam Subscriber Agreement: Difference between revisions
Add topic Created page with "== From Someoneontheinternet == I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on here is negative." |
m Mingyee moved page Talk:Valve Removes Arbitration Requirement From Steam Subscriber Agreement to Talk:Valve removes arbitration requirement from Steam Subscriber Agreement |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== From Someoneontheinternet == | == From Someoneontheinternet == | ||
I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on | I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative. | ||
Latest revision as of 13:48, 23 January 2025
From Someoneontheinternet[edit source]
I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative.