Software-gating: Difference between revisions
Renamed the software lock article essentially to make it clearer that it is different from activation and DRM because it is about putting marketed features for hardware behind software which isn't provided in the product itself, but needs to be installed or signed up for by the user |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Incomplete}} | {{Incomplete|Issue 1=should have real-world examples with references}} | ||
Related to [[forced app download]], '''software-gating''' or '''software companion''' is a method to control device features through ''external'' means in consumer electronic hardware. It is characterized by a dependence on that external software/app to configure or control some part of a device. | |||
==Reasons it exists== | |||
===Pro-consumer=== | |||
Software-gating is not inherently anti-consumer as it can provide useful in some scenarios. Examples of this being: | |||
*'''Customization''': It allows the user to finely tune device behavior, which would be really hard to implement with hardware buttons and switches. Examples of that being a piece of software to program the behavior of RGB keyboards, mice or hue-changing lamps. | |||
*'''Security features:''' Authentication devices that utilize software dependency to create security benefits for consumers. | |||
Signs for pro-consumer software companion: | |||
#'''Community software:''' The software vendor is open to user feedback, transparent about its roadmap, and is generally kept in check by its users, rather than the other way around. | |||
#'''Free software license''': The software vendor provides the source-code of the software, released under an open-source license, either [[wikipedia:Copyleft|copyleft]] or [[wikipedia:Permissive_software_license|permissive]]. This protects user choice, for example if the company goes into bankruptcy, or the software has privacy issues, because it can be fully modified and legally redistributed by an independent party. | |||
===Anti-consumer=== | |||
Software-gating becomes a problem when it limits the consumer's choice, their only options being privacy invasive, [[Forced cloud|cloud-dependent]], or intentionally limited in favor of paying a subscription. | |||
Examples of anti-consumer software-gating: | |||
* | *'''Unnecessary app:''' What could have easily been done with hardware switches or displays, is now instead done with an external app in order to exert more control over the customer. This is often marketed as a way to provide extended functionality, while in reality it is a solution in search of a problem. | ||
*'''Privacy invasive:''' The app fully tracks its users to sell their data to advertisers. | |||
Signs for anti-consumer software: | |||
#'''Features on demand:''' The software vendor restricts features in purchased hardware for the sake of a subscription-based business model. This inherently creates most of the problems below. | |||
#'''Company-first software:''' The software does not release their source-code, nor is not open to user feedback, and risk making it hard to use if the company goes into bankruptcy, or the software has privacy issues, because it cannot be modified and legally redistributed by an independent party. | |||
#'''Software dependence:''' Permanently locked bootloaders that limit what a consumer can run on their device. This means being dependent on the goodwill of the software vendors to respect the user's privacy, freedom of choice (for what is still left of it). | |||
* [[Digital rights management]] | ==See also== | ||
* [[ | |||
* [[Bootloader unlocking]] | *[[Digital rights management]] | ||
*[[Features on demand]] | |||
*[[Bootloader unlocking]] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Latest revision as of 19:41, 20 April 2026
⚠️This article has been marked as incomplete. Sourcing or verifiability needs additional work.
In particular:
- should have real-world examples with references
A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the
#appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.More info ▼
Articles must provide verifiable, credible evidence for their claims and avoid relying on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources. You can help by replacing weak citations with reputable reporting, corporate communications, receipts, repair logs, or independent investigative coverage that demonstrates the systemic relevance required by the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.
Related to forced app download, software-gating or software companion is a method to control device features through external means in consumer electronic hardware. It is characterized by a dependence on that external software/app to configure or control some part of a device.
Reasons it exists
[edit | edit source]Pro-consumer
[edit | edit source]Software-gating is not inherently anti-consumer as it can provide useful in some scenarios. Examples of this being:
- Customization: It allows the user to finely tune device behavior, which would be really hard to implement with hardware buttons and switches. Examples of that being a piece of software to program the behavior of RGB keyboards, mice or hue-changing lamps.
- Security features: Authentication devices that utilize software dependency to create security benefits for consumers.
Signs for pro-consumer software companion:
- Community software: The software vendor is open to user feedback, transparent about its roadmap, and is generally kept in check by its users, rather than the other way around.
- Free software license: The software vendor provides the source-code of the software, released under an open-source license, either copyleft or permissive. This protects user choice, for example if the company goes into bankruptcy, or the software has privacy issues, because it can be fully modified and legally redistributed by an independent party.
Anti-consumer
[edit | edit source]Software-gating becomes a problem when it limits the consumer's choice, their only options being privacy invasive, cloud-dependent, or intentionally limited in favor of paying a subscription.
Examples of anti-consumer software-gating:
- Unnecessary app: What could have easily been done with hardware switches or displays, is now instead done with an external app in order to exert more control over the customer. This is often marketed as a way to provide extended functionality, while in reality it is a solution in search of a problem.
- Privacy invasive: The app fully tracks its users to sell their data to advertisers.
Signs for anti-consumer software:
- Features on demand: The software vendor restricts features in purchased hardware for the sake of a subscription-based business model. This inherently creates most of the problems below.
- Company-first software: The software does not release their source-code, nor is not open to user feedback, and risk making it hard to use if the company goes into bankruptcy, or the software has privacy issues, because it cannot be modified and legally redistributed by an independent party.
- Software dependence: Permanently locked bootloaders that limit what a consumer can run on their device. This means being dependent on the goodwill of the software vendors to respect the user's privacy, freedom of choice (for what is still left of it).