Talk:Brother printers causing issues with third party inks: Difference between revisions
m response |
→On purpose sabotage: new section |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
[[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]] | [[Special:Contributions/2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582|2603:8080:2B05:C434:D554:41BD:32DF:5582]] | ||
:Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC) | :Whether they fix it or not this response warrants inclusion to the article in a "Brother's response" section. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 08:00, 6 March 2025 (UTC) | ||
== On purpose sabotage == | |||
Guys, | |||
I've been invited by Brother in their HQs in France. Their engineers BOASTED in front of me they had decreased the minimal temperature needed for the ink to get liquid. As a result, third-party toners manufacturers' ink does not completely get liquid. This decreases the quality (you see stains) and finally breaks the printer fuser unit. This is very expensive. | |||
I'll never ever purchase a Brother again. [[Special:Contributions/2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193|2A01:CB04:695:C700:AD7B:244C:35F4:9193]] 13:13, 23 October 2025 (UTC) | |||