Jump to content

Template:Irrelevant: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
← Older edit
VisualWikitext
Kostas (talk | contribs)
Autoconfirmed users, confirmed
2,009 edits
m divs instead of sections
No edit summary
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<!-- Uses style code from https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Template:Colored_box -->
<noinclude>
<div class="cat-mw-box" style="border-radius:0.2rem;border:1px solid #a2a9b1;margin-bottom:2rem">
== Usage ==
<div class="cat-mw-box-header" style="background:rgba(0,0,0,0.03);padding:0.2rem 1rem;font-size:1rem;">
Simply add <code><nowiki>{{Irrelevant}}</nowiki></code> at the top of an article whose connection to the wiki's mission is unclear.
<span style="margin-right:8px;">⚠️</span> '''Article status notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review'''
{{Irrelevant}}
</div>
=== Parameters ===
<div class="cat-mw-box-body" style="padding:0.2rem 1rem;">
* <code>nocat=yes</code> — suppress automatic categorisation.
 
* <code>clear=false</code> — don't insert a <code><nowiki>{{clear}}</nowiki></code> before the box.
This article has been flagged for '''questionable relevance'''. Its connection to the systemic consumer protection issues outlined in the [[Mission statement]] and [[Moderator Guidelines]] isn't clear.
=== Live preview ===
 
</noinclude>{{#switch:{{{clear|}}}|#default={{clear}}|false=}}<div style="border:1px solid rgba(144,60,116,0.8); background:rgba(144,60,116,0.08); padding:6px 12px; margin:0.5em auto; border-radius:3px; font-size:0.95em; max-width:600px;">
<div style="font-size:1.75em; font-weight: 500;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em"> Notice: This Article's Relevance Is Under Review  </div>
<span style="font-size:1.5em; margin-right:8px; vertical-align:middle; line-height:1;">⚠️</span><span style="vertical-align:middle;">'''This article's relevance is under review'''. It does not appear to [[Consumer_Rights_Wiki:Moderator_guidelines#1._Determining_inclusion_in_the_wiki|be in-scope]] for the wiki.</span><br>
----
<div style="margin-top:4px;">A moderator needs to check for consensus on relevancy before this notice can be removed. Visit the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|noticeboard]] or the <code>#appeals</code> channel in either [https://zulip.consumerrights.wiki/ Zulip] or [https://discord.gg/8w5rSNAXRf Discord] to request removal. Discussions of this article's relevancy should take place on its [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|talk page]].</div>
This article has been flagged for '''questionable relevance'''. Its connection to the systemic consumer protection issues outlined in the [[Mission statement]] and [[Moderator Guidelines]] isn't clear. Articles that focus on isolated incidents, personal disputes, or local matters may not meet the inclusion criteria for the Consumer Action Taskforce Wiki.
<div style="text-align:center; margin-top:0.3em;"><span class="mw-customtoggle-irrelevantmore" style="cursor:pointer; font-size:0.85em; font-weight:bold;">More info ▼</span></div>
 
<div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-irrelevantmore" style="margin-top:0.4em; padding-top:0.4em; border-top:1px solid rgba(144,60,116,0.2); font-size:0.9em;">
<div style="font-size:1.5em; font-weight: 450;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em"> Why This Article Is In Question </div>
You can help establish relevance by showing how the issue represents either large-scale consumer exploitation (systemic practices, recurring incidents, etc.) or a case of 'modern' consumer rights issues such as privacy violations, barriers to repair, or ownership rights, in line with the [[Mission statement]] and [[Moderator Guidelines]].
----
Articles in this wiki have to meet the following criteria:
* '''Systemic Nature''': Demonstrate a broader pattern of systemic abuse, negligence, or policies that align with modern consumer exploitation (e.g., ownership revocation, barriers to repair, privacy violations, changing the terms of the sale after the sale).
* '''Relevance''': Relate to consumer protection issues that extend beyond individual grievances or localized problems.
* '''Evidence''': Provide verifiable evidence or credible sources to support the author's claims and demonstrate systemic impact.
 
Examples of articles that do not meet these criteria:
* A single negative customer experience; with no evidence of systemic issues or company policies enabling such behavior.
* Localized disputes, such as a bad experience with a contractor or small business, better suited for platforms like Yelp or local consumer protection agencies.
* Complaints that focus on personal dissatisfaction (e.g., "I waited too long for a response") without tying the issue to broader consumer exploitation themes.
 
<div style="font-size:1.5em; font-weight: 450;padding-top:0.2em;padding-bottom:0.2em"> How You Can Improve This Article </div>
----
To justify the relevance of this article:
* Provide evidence demonstrating how the issue reflects broader consumer exploitation (e.g., systemic patterns, recurring incidents, or related company policies).
* Link the problem to modern forms of consumer protection concerns, such as privacy violations, barriers to repair, or ownership rights.
* Add credible sources or documentation that substantiate claims and connect them to systemic practices. i.e:
** A company that takes 5 days too long to refund a deposit is a bad Yelp review. Not eligible for inclusion.
** A company with 500,000 active repairs at any given time that purposely delays all deposit refunds for a period of five days, in order to invest/gamble with these deposits on their balance sheet, with verifiable hard proof from internal communications that this was an intentional & standard practice performed with malicious intent is eligible for inclusion.
 
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once you have made the required improvements, please visit the <code>#appeals</code> channel on our Discord server: [https://discord.gg/WUW6GGDMvW Join Here].
 
----
''End of Stub Notice. The article content begins below this line.''
[[Category:Articles marked as irrelevant]]
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}||{{#ifeq:{{{nocat|}}}|yes||[[Category:Articles marked as irrelevant]]}}}}</includeonly>

Latest revision as of 01:46, 6 May 2026

Usage

Simply add {{Irrelevant}} at the top of an article whose connection to the wiki's mission is unclear.

⚠️This article's relevance is under review. It does not appear to be in-scope for the wiki.

A moderator needs to check for consensus on relevancy before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal. Discussions of this article's relevancy should take place on its talk page.
More info ▼

You can help establish relevance by showing how the issue represents either large-scale consumer exploitation (systemic practices, recurring incidents, etc.) or a case of 'modern' consumer rights issues such as privacy violations, barriers to repair, or ownership rights, in line with the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.

Parameters

  • nocat=yes — suppress automatic categorisation.
  • clear=false — don't insert a {{clear}} before the box.

Live preview

⚠️This article's relevance is under review. It does not appear to be in-scope for the wiki.

A moderator needs to check for consensus on relevancy before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal. Discussions of this article's relevancy should take place on its talk page.
More info ▼

You can help establish relevance by showing how the issue represents either large-scale consumer exploitation (systemic practices, recurring incidents, etc.) or a case of 'modern' consumer rights issues such as privacy violations, barriers to repair, or ownership rights, in line with the Mission statement and Moderator Guidelines.

Retrieved from "https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Template:Irrelevant&oldid=52964"