Robinhood Financial: Difference between revisions
→Business model: ciatations |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|Name=Robinhood Financial, LLC|Type=Subsidiary|Founded=2013|Industry=Financial Services|Official Website=http://robinhood.com/|Logo=Robinhood (company) logo.svg}} | |Name=Robinhood Financial, LLC|Type=Subsidiary|Founded=2013|Industry=Financial Services|Official Website=http://robinhood.com/|Logo=Robinhood (company) logo.svg}} | ||
'''[[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Financial, LLC]],''' is a wholly-owned subsidiary of [[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Markets, Inc]]. The US app based brokerage company offers commission free stock and ETF trading ( exchange-traded funds ). Founded in 2013 by two former Stanford University room mates, the app was launched in 2015. Their mission is to democratize finance for all. | '''[[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Financial, LLC]],''' is a wholly-owned subsidiary of [[wikipedia:Robinhood_Markets|Robinhood Markets, Inc]]. The US app based brokerage company offers commission free stock and ETF trading ( exchange-traded funds ). Founded in 2013 by two former Stanford University room mates, the app was launched in 2015. Their mission is to democratize finance for all. | ||
==Consumer impact summary== | |||
===Mission statement=== | ===Mission statement=== | ||
Line 23: | Line 24: | ||
Critics argue that PFOF creates a conflict of interest, as they may prioritize routing orders to the highest paying firms rather than ensuring the best execution for customers. | Critics argue that PFOF creates a conflict of interest, as they may prioritize routing orders to the highest paying firms rather than ensuring the best execution for customers. | ||
===Negative impacts=== | |||
===Negative impacts | |||
====Misleading Practices and Lack of Transparency==== | ====Misleading Practices and Lack of Transparency==== | ||
Line 40: | Line 37: | ||
=====Restricting Consumer Choice===== | =====Restricting Consumer Choice===== | ||
*During the 2021 | *During the 2021 they abruptly halted trading in meme stocks, citing clearinghouse deposit requirements. This left individual investors unable to capitalize on market movements while institutional traders faced fewer restrictions. Critics argued this violated consumer rights by favoring systemic stability over fair access.<ref name=":3">{{Cite web |last=Orcutt |first=Johnathan |date=February 25, 2021 |title=The Legal Impact: Robinhood |url=https://law.unh.edu/blog/2021/02/legal-impact-robinhood |website=unh.edu}}</ref><ref name=":4">{{Cite web |last=Cabral |first=Sarah |last2=LaCombe |first2=Amy |date=December 1, 2021 |title=Robinhood, Reddit, and GameStop: What Happened and What Should Happen Next? |url=https://www.scu.edu/ethics/focus-areas/business-ethics/resources/robinhood-reddit-and-gamestop-what-happened-and-what-should-happen-next/ |website=scu.edu}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Goodman |first=Lawrence |last2=Lofchie |first2=Steven |last3=Lumsdaine |first3=Robin |date=February 23, 2021 |title=Robinhood and GameStop: Essential Issues and Next Steps for Regulators and Investors |url=https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/02/23/robinhood-and-gamestop-essential-issues-and-next-steps-for-regulators-and-investors/ |website=harvard.edu}}</ref> | ||
=====Exploitation of Inexperienced Investors===== | =====Exploitation of Inexperienced Investors===== | ||
Line 55: | Line 52: | ||
Users are forced into mandatory arbitration, limiting their ability to seek legal redress.<ref name=":3" /> | Users are forced into mandatory arbitration, limiting their ability to seek legal redress.<ref name=":3" /> | ||
== | ==Incidents== | ||
=== Death of a trader === | |||
In 2020 a user committed suicide after misinterpreted a negative balance due to poor UI design, leading to backlash over risk disclosures. | |||
=== GameStop short squeeze === | |||
''main article: [[GameStop Short Squeeze]]'' | |||
In 2021, decisions to restrict trading fueled accusations of market manipulation and hypocrisy due to it's 'for the people' branding. | |||
==References== | ==References== |