Talk:Generative AI: Difference between revisions

Line 6:

For example, the currently listed DeviantArt incident makes sense to include, but I think the Stability AI incident is probably beyond the scope of the Wiki. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 12:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, the StabilityAI one was a bit of a stretch tbh. I mostly just wanted to seed the page with some examples for people to eventually expand off of and used what I had previously researched as a basis. As for the scope of employee replacement, I want to focus it on rather the content the consumer receives being of lesser quality directly because of staff being replaced with AI. Would be ideal to leave a permanent comment for future contributors that reminds people of this scope, plus elaborates it better within the general controversy section, which probably should be updated to something like "General Consumer Rights Controversies". [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 12:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

:Yeah, the StabilityAI one was a bit of a stretch tbh. I mostly just wanted to seed the page with some examples for people to eventually expand off of and used what I had previously researched as a basis. As for the scope of employee replacement, I want to focus it on rather the content the consumer receives being of lesser quality directly because of staff being replaced with AI. Would be ideal to leave a permanent comment for future contributors that reminds people of this scope, plus elaborates it better within the general controversy section, which probably should be updated to something like "General Consumer Rights Controversies". [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 12:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

::No worries, that all makes sense! I'll go and add that note if you haven't already [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 12:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 For example, the currently listed DeviantArt incident makes sense to include, but I think the Stability AI incident is probably beyond the scope of the Wiki. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 12:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
-Yeah, the StabilityAI one was a bit of a stretch tbh. I mostly just wanted to seed the page with some examples for people to eventually expand off of and used what I had previously researched as a basis. As for the scope of employee replacement, I want to focus it on rather the content the consumer receives being of lesser quality directly because of staff being replaced with AI. Would be ideal to leave a permanent comment for future contributors that reminds people of this scope, plus elaborates it better within the general controversy section, which probably should be updated to something like "General Consumer Rights Controversies". [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 12:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
+:Yeah, the StabilityAI one was a bit of a stretch tbh. I mostly just wanted to seed the page with some examples for people to eventually expand off of and used what I had previously researched as a basis. As for the scope of employee replacement, I want to focus it on rather the content the consumer receives being of lesser quality directly because of staff being replaced with AI. Would be ideal to leave a permanent comment for future contributors that reminds people of this scope, plus elaborates it better within the general controversy section, which probably should be updated to something like "General Consumer Rights Controversies". [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 12:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
+::No worries, that all makes sense! I'll go and add that note if you haven't already [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 12:56, 18 January 2025 (UTC)