Talk:Malicious compliance: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 29 August by AnotherConsumerRightsPerson in topic Relevance
→Relevance: new section |
m Drakeula moved page Talk:Malicious Compliance to Talk:Malicious compliance: Misspelled title: Not in sentence case |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevance == | ==Relevance== | ||
I get why this concept may be relevant, but I don't believe it's worth a dedicated article. It's vague and isn't fundamentally unethical. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 02:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC) | I get why this concept may be relevant, but I don't believe it's worth a dedicated article. It's vague and isn't fundamentally unethical. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 02:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC) | ||
:It’s tiny too, you can go on the [[Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard|Moderators' noticeboard]] about this. Just not much to talk about at all. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 07:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 03:37, 12 October 2025
Relevance
[edit source]I get why this concept may be relevant, but I don't believe it's worth a dedicated article. It's vague and isn't fundamentally unethical. Beanie Bo (talk) 02:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
- It’s tiny too, you can go on the Moderators' noticeboard about this. Just not much to talk about at all. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)