Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

Privacywarrior (talk | contribs)
Tags: Reverted Reply
Undo revision 29336 by Privacywarrior (talk) Per what I’ve said on the original Moderators’ noticeboard.
Tag: Undo
 
Line 41: Line 41:
:For now, I've changed the relevancy tag to an incomplete one (lacking verification), the issue being that there are no sources that actually implicate itron in having done anything wrong, with most of the stuff surrounding 'maybe it could be/has been hacked' being authorial speculation insofar as I can tell.
:For now, I've changed the relevancy tag to an incomplete one (lacking verification), the issue being that there are no sources that actually implicate itron in having done anything wrong, with most of the stuff surrounding 'maybe it could be/has been hacked' being authorial speculation insofar as I can tell.
:There's also no secondary reporting - i.e. no media sources cited as framing any of these things as a problem. This is something which should be there to demonstrate notability. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 09:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
:There's also no secondary reporting - i.e. no media sources cited as framing any of these things as a problem. This is something which should be there to demonstrate notability. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 09:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
::Understood, unfortunately most of the articles I found the place blame on the distribution companies for invasive policies. The real issue is Itron has unlimited access to any of their smart meters data with out the end users knowledge. I am not quite sure how to capture this topic fully. [[User:Privacywarrior|Privacywarrior]] ([[User talk:Privacywarrior|talk]]) 14:40, 2 November 2025 (UTC)


==Watch out for this person==
==Watch out for this person==