Digital Millennium Copyright Act: Difference between revisions

(6 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

~~The Digital Millenium Copytight act was a legislation passed in 1998 to amend title 17, United States Code.~~

~~Its primary provision was to outlaw the use or distribution of tools that, "Circumvent Access Control."~~

The law ~~contains no consideration~~ of ~~fair use~~ and ~~has the effect~~ of ~~preventing people~~ from ~~using or repairing equipment~~ that ~~they own~~.

The '''[[wikipedia:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act|Digital Millenium Copyright Act]]''' (DMCA) is a copyright law passed in 1998 to amend Title 17 of the United States Code. Among its provisions are the criminalization of production and dissemination of information intended to circumvent copy protections that protect intellectual property, such as those considered digital rights management. It was later amended in 1998 to shield from liability ISPs that consumers may use to gain access to such information.

~~One such example~~ is ~~[[John Deere]] preventing 3rd party maintenance~~ of ~~farmers~~' ~~tractors~~.

The law also provides that the Library of Congress issue exemptions from the prohibition when it is shown that access-control technology has had a substantial adverse effect on the ability of people to make non-infringing uses of copyrighted works. These exemptions are not granted in perpetuity. They are revised every 3 years all at once and existing exemptions must be resubmitted for the next rulemaking cycle alongside any new ones.

This law is one of the earliest to address the era of digital multimedia where previous law was deemed insufficient with the technology of the time period (even though its affect covers all digital information). Although the law is meant to supplement intellectual property rights, there are concerns that it comes into conflict with consumers' interests. This includes due to the specific text of the law, as well as its interpretation being used to attack activity by consumers that would otherwise be permitted. Concerns over Right to Repair, Fair Use, and an overall lack of useful paths to refute or redress accusations of violating the law remain.

[[Category:Common terms]]

[[Category:Legislation]]

[[Category:US legislation]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The Digital Millenium Copytight act was a legislation passed in 1998 to amend  title 17, United States Code.
+{{StubNotice}}
+{{ToneWarning}}
-Its primary provision was to outlaw the use or distribution of tools that, "Circumvent Access Control."
-The law contains no consideration of fair use and has the effect of preventing people from using or repairing equipment that they own.
+The '''[[wikipedia:Digital_Millennium_Copyright_Act|Digital Millenium Copyright Act]]''' (DMCA) is a copyright law passed in 1998 to amend Title 17 of the United States Code. Among its provisions are the criminalization of production and dissemination of information intended to circumvent copy protections that protect intellectual property, such as those considered digital rights management. It was later amended in 1998 to shield from liability ISPs that consumers may use to gain access to such information.
-One such example is [[John Deere]] preventing 3rd party maintenance of farmers' tractors.
+The law also provides that the Library of Congress issue exemptions from the prohibition when it is shown that access-control technology has had a substantial adverse effect on the ability of people to make non-infringing uses of copyrighted works. These exemptions are not granted in perpetuity. They are revised every 3 years all at once and existing exemptions must be resubmitted for the next rulemaking cycle alongside any new ones.
+This law is one of the earliest to address the era of digital multimedia where previous law was deemed insufficient with the technology of the time period (even though its affect covers all digital information). Although the law is meant to supplement intellectual property rights, there are concerns that it comes into conflict with consumers' interests. This includes due to the specific text of the law, as well as its interpretation being used to attack activity by consumers that would otherwise be permitted. Concerns over Right to Repair, Fair Use, and an overall lack of useful paths to refute or redress accusations of violating the law remain.
 [[Category:Common terms]]
+[[Category:Legislation]]
+[[Category:US legislation]]