HP: Difference between revisions

!Sub-brand<ref>{{Cite web |title=Brand Central |url=https://www.hp.com/us-en/hp-information/brandcentral.html |url-status=live |website=[[HP Inc.]]}}</ref>

|Security service to lock in and add anti-virus to HP laptops for remote offices<ref>{{Cite web |title=HP Wolf Security |url=https://www.hp.com/us-en/security/endpoint-security-solutions.html |url-status=live |website=[[HP Inc.]]}}</ref>

*Some printers requiring ink cartridges to be sufficiently filled to use scanning and faxing features, and scanning often mandating an HP account and app, sometimes even an internet connection;

HP started to remove support information, software downloads and documentation for older products, instead redirecting customers to community forums.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Sebastian |first=Linus |date=2025-10-21 |title=HP Keeps Getting Worse |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNM_xUcYpK0 |access-date=2025-10-21 |website=Youtube – LMG Clips}}</ref>  

In February 2025, HP Inc. instituted a policy to artificially force all consumer PC & print customers to wait a minimum of 15 minutes when calling support. This policy pushes the callers towards the cheaper online support channels, an operation which HP Inc. calls influencing customers to "increase their adoption of digital self-solve".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Kunert |first=Paul |date=20 Feb 2025 |title=HP deliberately adds 15 minutes waiting time for telephone support calls |url=https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/20/hp_deliberately_adds_15_minutes/ |url-status=live |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |website=The Register}}</ref>  

An over-the-air update for some HP printer products (DeskJets and LaserJets) with network capabilities caused '''errors 79 and 49''' to be shown on the user interface of these devices, '''soft-locking''' the printers. In some instances, these faulty updates were not avoidable, because the "update" prompt had to be accepted to re-access the printer. First reports of this showed up in public around October 2022.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Born |first=Günter |date=17 Nov 2022 |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |title=Okt. 2022 Firmware-Update macht HP-Drucker mit Error 49 oder 79 unbrauchbar |url=https://www.borncity.com/blog/2022/11/17/okt-2022-firmware-update-macht-hp-drucker-mit-service-error-49-unbrauchbar/ |website=Borns IT- und Windows-Blog |language=de}}</ref>

In some cases, the devices could be recovered,<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 Nov 2022 |title=Color LaserJet Pro MFP-M281fdw shows 49 Service Error after firmware update from 20th October |url=https://h30434.www3.hp.com/t5/Printing-Errors-or-Lights-Stuck-Print-Jobs/Color-LaserJet-Pro-MFP-M281fdw-shows-49-Service-Error-after/m-p/8540292/highlight/true#M962703 |url-status=live |access-date=15 Mar 2025 |website=[[HP]]}}</ref> but for an unknown number of users, '''no official nor unofficial fix was applicable'''. This effectively led to bricked devices that had to be replaced, often but not always, right after the warranty period had ended.

On May 22, 2023, the IITC brought forward another complaint against HP for preventing the use of third-party ink cartridges while also ''claiming'' to be EPEAT-compliant.<ref>{{Cite web |first= |date=2023-05-23 |title=Int’l Imaging Technology Council Brings Another Complaint Against HP Inc. over Firmware and Greenwashing |url=https://i-itc.org/intl-imaging-technology-council-brings-another-complaint-against-hp-inc-over-firmware-and-greenwashing/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20251202222750/https://i-itc.org/intl-imaging-technology-council-brings-another-complaint-against-hp-inc-over-firmware-and-greenwashing/ |archive-date=2025-12-02 |access-date=2025-08-21 |website=International Imaging Technology Council}}</ref> The IITC accused HP of violating the same provision as the last complaint which prohibits this. HP's datasheet for their '''OfficeJet Pro 9015e All-in-One printer''' labeled the product as EPEAT Silver compliant, while also claiming that it requires the "exclusive use of Original HP Ink cartridges for the life of the printer" as well as stating that "Cartridges using a non-HP chip may not function or may cease to function."<ref>{{Cite web |first= |title=HP OfficeJet Pro 9015e All-in-One Printer |url=https://www8.hp.com/h20195/v2/GetDocument.aspx?docname=4aa7-8770enuc |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230525122203/https://h20195.www2.hp.com/v2/getpdf.aspx/4aa7-8770enuc.pdf |archive-date=2023-05-25 |access-date=2025-08-21 |website=www8.hp.com}}</ref> The IITC accused HP of greenwashing and asked the Global Electronics Council to review the EPEAT registrations for all of HP's HP+ and Dynamic Security printers.