Bananabot (talk | contribs)
Added archive URLs for 33 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot
Marc84 (talk | contribs)
References: Move archive links into cite-web template to fix errors.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 38: Line 38:
In mid 2019, Doordash suffered a data breach that affected 4.9 million customers, drivers, and businesses sensitive information combined. Individuals that had joined Doordash after April 5th of 2018 were not affected. This breach took 5 months to be found. Doordash claims that "a third-party service provider," was to blame for this leak, but the third party was never named. The types of data exposed is listed in the chart below.
In mid 2019, Doordash suffered a data breach that affected 4.9 million customers, drivers, and businesses sensitive information combined. Individuals that had joined Doordash after April 5th of 2018 were not affected. This breach took 5 months to be found. Doordash claims that "a third-party service provider," was to blame for this leak, but the third party was never named. The types of data exposed is listed in the chart below.
{| class="wikitable"
{| class="wikitable"
|+<big>Breached Data that was exposed</big> <ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=Coban |first=Erkin |date=2025-04-08 |title=DoorDash Fees and Commissions for Restaurants: Detailed 2025 Guide - Restaurant Success Blog {{!}} Menuviel |url=https://blog.menuviel.com/doordash-fees-and-commissions-for-restaurants/ |url-status=live |website=Menuviel}} ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251117164837/https://blog.menuviel.com/doordash-fees-and-commissions-for-restaurants/ Archived])</ref>
|+<big>Breached Data that was exposed</big> <ref name=":5">{{Cite web |last=Coban |first=Erkin |date=2025-04-08 |title=DoorDash Fees and Commissions for Restaurants: Detailed 2025 Guide - Restaurant Success Blog {{!}} Menuviel |url=https://blog.menuviel.com/doordash-fees-and-commissions-for-restaurants/ |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251117164837/https://blog.menuviel.com/doordash-fees-and-commissions-for-restaurants/ |archive-date=2025-11-17 |website=Menuviel}}</ref>
!Customers
!Customers
|name, email and delivery addresses, order history, phone numbers, hashed & salted passwords and the last four digits of their payment cards taken.
|name, email and delivery addresses, order history, phone numbers, hashed & salted passwords and the last four digits of their payment cards taken.
Line 51: Line 51:


===Adding restaurants to their platform without other business's consent===
===Adding restaurants to their platform without other business's consent===
Starting around 2020, Doordash had decided that the company needed more outreach. To do this, the company started adding businesses that had no arrangements for takeout or delivery without the owners consent.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Pershan |first=Caleb |date=2020-01-29 |title=Delivery Apps Keep Adding Restaurants Without Their Consent  - Eater |url=https://www.eater.com/2020/1/29/21113416/grubhub-seamless-kin-khao-online-delivery-mistake-doordash |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=EATER |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251121074826/https://www.eater.com/2020/1/29/21113416/grubhub-seamless-kin-khao-online-delivery-mistake-doordash |archive-date=21 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=Settembre |first=Jeanette |date=2020-01-21 |title=DoorDash, Grubhub skewered by small restaurants for posting menus without permission {{!}} Fox Business |url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/small-business/doordash-grubhub-restaurant-listing-without-permission.amp |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-09 |website=Fox Business}} ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251126090555/https://www.foxbusiness.com/small-business/doordash-grubhub-restaurant-listing-without-permission.amp Archived])</ref> This has led to increased stress on businesses that were not ready for a higher influx of volume orders but also being charged up to 30% in referral fees depending on the business.<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":7" /> Many small corporations and restaurants were impacted the most due to these policies; mostly because profit margins are usually lower than a multi billion dollar franchise that has been tailored to do takeout for decades, or industry chains that are used to higher order volumes. Behavior like this may end up running smaller unprepared business operations to close permanently, leaving only the bigger corporations to compete for the consumers' purchasing power.
Starting around 2020, Doordash had decided that the company needed more outreach. To do this, the company started adding businesses that had no arrangements for takeout or delivery without the owners consent.<ref name=":6">{{Cite web |last=Pershan |first=Caleb |date=2020-01-29 |title=Delivery Apps Keep Adding Restaurants Without Their Consent  - Eater |url=https://www.eater.com/2020/1/29/21113416/grubhub-seamless-kin-khao-online-delivery-mistake-doordash |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=EATER |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251121074826/https://www.eater.com/2020/1/29/21113416/grubhub-seamless-kin-khao-online-delivery-mistake-doordash |archive-date=21 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref name=":7">{{Cite web |last=Settembre |first=Jeanette |date=2020-01-21 |title=DoorDash, Grubhub skewered by small restaurants for posting menus without permission {{!}} Fox Business |url=https://www.foxbusiness.com/small-business/doordash-grubhub-restaurant-listing-without-permission.amp |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251126090555/https://www.foxbusiness.com/small-business/doordash-grubhub-restaurant-listing-without-permission |archive-date=2025-11-26 |access-date=2025-04-09 |website=Fox Business}}</ref> This has led to increased stress on businesses that were not ready for a higher influx of volume orders but also being charged up to 30% in referral fees depending on the business.<ref name=":5" /><ref name=":7" /> Many small corporations and restaurants were impacted the most due to these policies; mostly because profit margins are usually lower than a multi billion dollar franchise that has been tailored to do takeout for decades, or industry chains that are used to higher order volumes. Behavior like this may end up running smaller unprepared business operations to close permanently, leaving only the bigger corporations to compete for the consumers' purchasing power.


===Pocketing driver app tips to payout other dashers<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Glenn |first=Lindey |date=2025-03-31 |title=DoorDash’s $1 BILLION Lawsuit: Exposing DoorDash’s Predatory Business Model |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-gPld7e3do |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=Youtube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=A-gPld7e3do |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=James |first=Letitia |date=2025-02-24 |title=Attorney General James Secures $16.75 Million from DoorDash for Cheating Delivery Workers Out of Tips |url=https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2025/attorney-general-james-secures-1675-million-doordash-cheating-delivery-workers |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-09 |website=NY GOV |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260204085541/https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2025/attorney-general-james-secures-1675-million-doordash-cheating-delivery-workers |archive-date=4 Feb 2026}}</ref>===
===Pocketing driver app tips to payout other dashers<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Glenn |first=Lindey |date=2025-03-31 |title=DoorDash’s $1 BILLION Lawsuit: Exposing DoorDash’s Predatory Business Model |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-gPld7e3do |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=Youtube |archive-url=https://preservetube.com/watch?v=A-gPld7e3do |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=James |first=Letitia |date=2025-02-24 |title=Attorney General James Secures $16.75 Million from DoorDash for Cheating Delivery Workers Out of Tips |url=https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2025/attorney-general-james-secures-1675-million-doordash-cheating-delivery-workers |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-09 |website=NY GOV |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260204085541/https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2025/attorney-general-james-secures-1675-million-doordash-cheating-delivery-workers |archive-date=4 Feb 2026}}</ref>===
Line 59: Line 59:


===Using BNPL services to target the financially challenged consumers===
===Using BNPL services to target the financially challenged consumers===
As of March 2025, Doordash has decided to partner up with Klarna for [[Buy Now Pay Later|BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later)]] services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Steinberg |first=Brooke |date=2025-03-24 |title=DoorDash now offering eat now, pay later payments through Klarna |url=https://nypost.com/2025/03/24/lifestyle/DoorDash-now-offering-eat-now-pay-later-payments-through-klarna/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=New York Post |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251128204014/https://nypost.com/2025/03/24/lifestyle/doordash-now-offering-eat-now-pay-later-payments-through-klarna/ |archive-date=28 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-03-20 |title=DoorDash Partners with Klarna to Offer US Customers Even More Convenience with Flexible Payments {{!}} DoorDash |url=https://about.doordash.com/en-us/news/doordash-partners-with-klarna |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-14 |website=Doordash}} ([http://web.archive.org/web/20251112074016/https://about.doordash.com/en-us/news/doordash-partners-with-klarna Archived])</ref> This partnership is aimed at the consumers that want food delivery but are currently unable to afford it. However, it's a deceptive practice that can further financially ruin consumers. While [[Buy Now Pay Later|BNPL]] can defer payments interest free, it does charge late fees. Consumers that are already financially strapped for cash may find it difficult to repay these loans if they are not careful. This may boost Doordash's profits by taking advantage of consumers that are not financially savvy.
As of March 2025, Doordash has decided to partner up with Klarna for [[Buy Now Pay Later|BNPL (Buy Now Pay Later)]] services.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Steinberg |first=Brooke |date=2025-03-24 |title=DoorDash now offering eat now, pay later payments through Klarna |url=https://nypost.com/2025/03/24/lifestyle/DoorDash-now-offering-eat-now-pay-later-payments-through-klarna/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=New York Post |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251128204014/https://nypost.com/2025/03/24/lifestyle/doordash-now-offering-eat-now-pay-later-payments-through-klarna/ |archive-date=28 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-03-20 |title=DoorDash Partners with Klarna to Offer US Customers Even More Convenience with Flexible Payments {{!}} DoorDash |url=https://about.doordash.com/en-us/news/doordash-partners-with-klarna |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251112074016/https://about.doordash.com/en-us/news/doordash-partners-with-klarna |archive-date=2025-11-12 |access-date=2025-05-14 |website=Doordash}}</ref> This partnership is aimed at the consumers that want food delivery but are currently unable to afford it. However, it's a deceptive practice that can further financially ruin consumers. While [[Buy Now Pay Later|BNPL]] can defer payments interest free, it does charge late fees. Consumers that are already financially strapped for cash may find it difficult to repay these loans if they are not careful. This may boost Doordash's profits by taking advantage of consumers that are not financially savvy.


===Using Dashpass subscription model to surcharge business's on order commissions===
===Using Dashpass subscription model to surcharge business's on order commissions===
<blockquote>"About eight months after Washington, D.C. placed a 15% cap on third-party delivery commission fees to help restaurants during the pandemic, DoorDash appears to have found a workaround. According to the Washington City Paper, restaurants that use DoorDash’s DashPass subscription feature were sent a notice stating that the cap is “only applicable to Classic orders” and doesn’t apply to the DashPass program."..."DoorDash calls DashPass an “optional, premium offering and separate from DoorDash’s core services.” The company said that beginning Dec. 9, it will begin charging restaurants the contractual rate in their original agreements, City Paper reports. The changes to DashPash charges are part of a limited test in fewer than five cities, including D.C. and cities in the Bay Area."<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Kelso |first=Alicia |date=2020-12-07 |title=DoorDash hit with cease-and-desist letter from DC attorney general {{!}} Restaurant Dive |url=https://www.restaurantdive.com/news/doordash-could-use-dashpash-as-a-workaround-to-delivery-fee-caps/591701/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=Restaurant Dive}} ([https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040105/https://www.restaurantdive.com/news/doordash-could-use-dashpash-as-a-workaround-to-delivery-fee-caps/591701/ Archived])</ref></blockquote>By using this workaround, Doordash has negatively impacted many small businesses and restaurants that operate within the area. They did, however, allow ''"Merchants can choose to opt out of DashPass at any time, a DoorDash spokesperson said"<ref name=":1" />.'' Though there are many consumers that do use Dashpass due to the savings for users that use their delivery services frequently. By opting out, businesses are effectively blacklisting themselves from the users that frequently use the app for deliveries. Doordash's spokesperson justifies this<blockquote>"The spokesperson called delivery fee restrictions a “one-size fits all” solution that impacts the company’s ability to provide quality service and pay. Merchant fees help the company cover business costs like Dasher pay, background checks, occupational Dasher insurance and website upkeep, the spokesperson said."<ref name=":1" /></blockquote>Which apparently the Dashpass subscription that consumers pay does not cover this. This is just an excuse to further pass on costs while maintaining the profits of the subscription and free delivery; which is the main selling point of the subscription service.
<blockquote>"About eight months after Washington, D.C. placed a 15% cap on third-party delivery commission fees to help restaurants during the pandemic, DoorDash appears to have found a workaround. According to the Washington City Paper, restaurants that use DoorDash’s DashPass subscription feature were sent a notice stating that the cap is “only applicable to Classic orders” and doesn’t apply to the DashPass program."..."DoorDash calls DashPass an “optional, premium offering and separate from DoorDash’s core services.” The company said that beginning Dec. 9, it will begin charging restaurants the contractual rate in their original agreements, City Paper reports. The changes to DashPash charges are part of a limited test in fewer than five cities, including D.C. and cities in the Bay Area."<ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Kelso |first=Alicia |date=2020-12-07 |title=DoorDash hit with cease-and-desist letter from DC attorney general {{!}} Restaurant Dive |url=https://www.restaurantdive.com/news/doordash-could-use-dashpash-as-a-workaround-to-delivery-fee-caps/591701/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040105/https://www.restaurantdive.com/news/doordash-could-use-dashpash-as-a-workaround-to-delivery-fee-caps/591701/ |archive-date=2026-02-23 |access-date=2025-04-04 |website=Restaurant Dive}}</ref></blockquote>By using this workaround, Doordash has negatively impacted many small businesses and restaurants that operate within the area. They did, however, allow ''"Merchants can choose to opt out of DashPass at any time, a DoorDash spokesperson said"<ref name=":1" />.'' Though there are many consumers that do use Dashpass due to the savings for users that use their delivery services frequently. By opting out, businesses are effectively blacklisting themselves from the users that frequently use the app for deliveries. Doordash's spokesperson justifies this<blockquote>"The spokesperson called delivery fee restrictions a “one-size fits all” solution that impacts the company’s ability to provide quality service and pay. Merchant fees help the company cover business costs like Dasher pay, background checks, occupational Dasher insurance and website upkeep, the spokesperson said."<ref name=":1" /></blockquote>Which apparently the Dashpass subscription that consumers pay does not cover this. This is just an excuse to further pass on costs while maintaining the profits of the subscription and free delivery; which is the main selling point of the subscription service.


This has caught the eye of D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine on December 10 of 2020. They have sent a cease and desist notice on Tuesday warning Doordash that charging restaurants more than 15% on commissions may violate District laws. The company complied two days later stating they "decided not to charge DC restaurants their contractual DashPass rate at this time."<ref name=":1" />
This has caught the eye of D.C. Attorney General Karl Racine on December 10 of 2020. They have sent a cease and desist notice on Tuesday warning Doordash that charging restaurants more than 15% on commissions may violate District laws. The company complied two days later stating they "decided not to charge DC restaurants their contractual DashPass rate at this time."<ref name=":1" />
Line 75: Line 75:


====Data breach lawsuit (2019)====
====Data breach lawsuit (2019)====
In early may Doordash had a data breach with over 4.9 million effected individuals. All users who registered past April 5th 2018 were safe from the data that was stolen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whittaker |first=Zack |date=2016-09-26 |title=DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9 million customers, workers and merchants |url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-16 |website=Tech Crunch}}</ref> This has resulted in a class action in October 2019 against Doordash for not protecting user data.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2019-08-04 |title=DoorDash Sued Over 2019 Data Breach Affecting More Than 4.9 Million Users |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |url-status=live |access-date=2025-06-16 |website=Class Action Org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250825224250/https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |archive-date=25 Aug 2025}}</ref>
In early may Doordash had a data breach with over 4.9 million effected individuals. All users who registered past April 5th 2018 were safe from the data that was stolen.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Whittaker |first=Zack |date=2016-09-26 |title=DoorDash confirms data breach affected 4.9 million customers, workers and merchants |url=https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-05-16 |website=Tech Crunch |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260223040204/https://techcrunch.com/2019/09/26/doordash-data-breach/ |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> This has resulted in a class action in October 2019 against Doordash for not protecting user data.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Shaak |first=Erin |date=2019-08-04 |title=DoorDash Sued Over 2019 Data Breach Affecting More Than 4.9 Million Users |url=https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |url-status=live |access-date=2025-06-16 |website=Class Action Org |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20250825224250/https://www.classaction.org/news/doordash-sued-over-2019-data-breach-affecting-more-than-4-9-million-users |archive-date=25 Aug 2025}}</ref>


====Withholding of tips and subsequent class-action lawsuits (2019)====
====Withholding of tips and subsequent class-action lawsuits (2019)====
Line 85: Line 85:


====Antitrust litigation (2020)====
====Antitrust litigation (2020)====
The Dacitashvili has filed against Grubhub, Doordash, Postmates and Uber Eats for having a majoritive monopoly over the food delivery market because of the way it selectively signed contracts with businesses to list them on the platform. Many of the clauses stated that delivery prices will be identical to dine in prices.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=2020-05-14 |title=Restaurants Are Desperate — But You May Not Be Helping When You Use Delivery Apps |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=NPR |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251228185547/https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |archive-date=28 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=2020-04-13 |title=Grubhub, DoorDash, Postmates, Uber Eats are sued over restaurant prices amid pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1/ |url-status=live |access-date=2020-08-30 |website=Reuters}}</ref> Plaintiffs argued that this increased the cost unfairly to dine-in customers because all defendants required the restaurants to cover the delivery fees ranging from 13% - 40% of revenue.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /> Keep in mind that restaurants like supermarkets runs on slim profit margins with the average being 3% - 9% total. This case seeks treble damages (multiply all damages by 3) for overcharges from the beginning of 2016 of April from the defendants delivery apps.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-04-13 |title=Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |url-status=live |archive-date= |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=S3 Documentcloud |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040552/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |archive-date=23 Feb 2026}}</ref> Many preliminaries have happened since then but is unclear when the trial will actually begin.
The Dacitashvili has filed against Grubhub, Doordash, Postmates and Uber Eats for having a majoritive monopoly over the food delivery market because of the way it selectively signed contracts with businesses to list them on the platform. Many of the clauses stated that delivery prices will be identical to dine in prices.<ref name=":15">{{Cite web |last=Allyn |first=Bobby |date=2020-05-14 |title=Restaurants Are Desperate — But You May Not Be Helping When You Use Delivery Apps |url=https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |url-status=live |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=NPR |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251228185547/https://www.npr.org/2020/05/14/856444431/cities-crack-down-on-food-delivery-app-fees-as-restaurants-struggle-to-survive |archive-date=28 Dec 2025}}</ref><ref name=":16">{{Cite web |last=Stempel |first=Jonathan |date=2020-04-13 |title=Grubhub, DoorDash, Postmates, Uber Eats are sued over restaurant prices amid pandemic |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1/ |url-status=live |access-date=2020-08-30 |website=Reuters |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20230527142554/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-food-delivery-laws-idUSKCN21V2C1 |archive-date=27 May 2023}}</ref> Plaintiffs argued that this increased the cost unfairly to dine-in customers because all defendants required the restaurants to cover the delivery fees ranging from 13% - 40% of revenue.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /> Keep in mind that restaurants like supermarkets runs on slim profit margins with the average being 3% - 9% total. This case seeks treble damages (multiply all damages by 3) for overcharges from the beginning of 2016 of April from the defendants delivery apps.<ref name=":15" /><ref name=":16" /><ref>{{Cite web |date=2020-04-13 |title=Case 1:20-cv-03000-LAK Document |url=https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt |url-status=live |archive-date=23 Feb 2026 |access-date=2025-08-30 |website=S3 Documentcloud |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260223040552/https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6890558/DAVITASHVILI-v-Grubhub-ET-AL.txt }}</ref> Many preliminaries have happened since then but is unclear when the trial will actually begin.


====Litigation for illegal unauthorized restaurant listing (2021)====
====Litigation for illegal unauthorized restaurant listing (2021)====