AMD: Difference between revisions
Added archive URLs for 1 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot |
SinexTitan (talk | contribs) fucking stupid |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Martin |first=Dylan |date=27 Aug 2019 |title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit |url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit |archive-date=10 Aug 2024 |access-date=2 Dec 2025 |website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hachman |first=Mark |date=28 Aug 2019 |title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip |url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html |archive-date=3 Oct 2024 |access-date=2 Dec 2025 |website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 Jan 2019 |title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices |url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf |archive-date=17 Feb 2024 |access-date=2 Dec 2025 |website=The Register}}</ref> | AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Martin |first=Dylan |date=27 Aug 2019 |title=AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit |url=https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240810172133/https://www.crn.com/news/components-peripherals/amd-reaches-12-1m-settlement-for-bulldozer-false-advertising-suit |archive-date=10 Aug 2024 |access-date=2 Dec 2025 |website=CRN}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Hachman |first=Mark |date=28 Aug 2019 |title=AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip |url=https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20241003044413/https://www.pcworld.com/article/397954/amd-settles-bulldozer-class-action-suit-that-could-pay-out-up-to-35-per-chip.html |archive-date=3 Oct 2024 |access-date=2 Dec 2025 |website=PCWorld}}</ref> And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.<ref>{{Cite web |date=22 Jan 2019 |title=Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices |url=https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240217004410/https://regmedia.co.uk/2019/01/22/amd-core-class-action.pdf |archive-date=17 Feb 2024 |access-date=2 Dec 2025 |website=The Register}}</ref> | ||
== | ==Products== | ||
=== | === CPUs: === | ||
* | * {{wplink|Epyc}} (server lineup) | ||
* {{wplink|Ryzen}} (consumer lineup) | |||
* {{wplink|Threadripper}} (HEDT lineup) | |||
* | |||
* | |||
=== | === GPUs: === | ||
* | * {{wplink|Radeon}} (consumer lineup) | ||
* {{wplink|Radeon Pro}} (workstation lineup) | |||
* {{wplink|Radeon Instinct}} (ML targeted workstation lineup) | |||
* | |||
* | |||
===Networking=== | ===Networking=== | ||
* | *Solarflare Ethernet Adapters | ||
* | *Telco and Networking | ||
* | *Alveo for Data Centers | ||
* | *Pensando DPU | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Latest revision as of 05:03, 26 March 2026
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
| Basic information | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1969-05-01 |
| Legal Structure | Public |
| Industry | Semiconductors, Computer hardware |
| Also known as | |
| Official website | https://www.amd.com/ |
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. or AMD is an American technology company that designs and sells computer components such as central processing unit (CPUs), graphics processing unit (GPUs) and related products for both commercial and enterprise use. AMD was cofounded in 1969 by Walter Jeremiah “Jerry” Sanders, a former executive at Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation, and seven colleagues.[1]
Consumer-impact summary
[edit | edit source]
Incidents
[edit | edit source]This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the AMD category.
Abandonment of the sTRX4 platform (2019)
[edit | edit source]- Main article: link to the main article
On November 25, 2019, AMD released socket sTRX4 alongside their Threadripper 3000 series of HEDT (high-end desktop) processors with the promise of long term support for the platform.[2][3] This along with the strong reputation of socket AM4 led many people to invest into the platform. Despite the promises made, AMD ultimately fell flat and only supported a total of one generation of CPUs before freezing the regular Ryzen Threadripper lineup till the release of Threadripper 7000 on socket sTR5.
"Bulldozer" CPU false advertisement lawsuit (2015-2019)
[edit | edit source]AMD settled the lawsuit with a $12.1 million payout, which is estimated to have compensated up to $35 per applicant that could give a proof of purchase. The complaint was about the Bulldozer processors being marketed as the "first native 8-core desktop processor," while this was allegedly false advertising. The CPU has 4 modules with each 2 sub-processors that shared resources instead of 8 independent cores that could perform separately and simultaneously.[4][5] And it was demonstrated that the alleged customer damages caused by the allegedly misleading claims can be measured on a class-wide basis.[6]
Products
[edit | edit source]CPUs:
[edit | edit source]- Epyc (server lineup)
- Ryzen (consumer lineup)
- Threadripper (HEDT lineup)
GPUs:
[edit | edit source]- Radeon (consumer lineup)
- Radeon Pro (workstation lineup)
- Radeon Instinct (ML targeted workstation lineup)
Networking
[edit | edit source]- Solarflare Ethernet Adapters
- Telco and Networking
- Alveo for Data Centers
- Pensando DPU
See also
[edit | edit source]References
[edit | edit source]- ↑ "Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. | American Semiconductor Company | Britannica Money". Britannica. Retrieved 2026-02-23. (Archived)
- ↑ AMDOfficial. "Performance Preview: 3rd Gen AMD Ryzen Threadripper Processors for Creators". Reddit. Archived from the original on 2025-08-02. Retrieved 2025-08-02.
- ↑ Jeffrey, Cal (2019-11-12). "AMD commits to 'long-term' support for sTRX4 CPU socket used with third-gen Threadripper". TechSpot. Archived from the original on 2025-08-02. Retrieved 2025-08-02.
- ↑ Martin, Dylan (27 Aug 2019). "AMD Reaches $12.1M Settlement In Bulldozer False Advertising Suit". CRN. Archived from the original on 10 Aug 2024. Retrieved 2 Dec 2025.
- ↑ Hachman, Mark (28 Aug 2019). "AMD settles Bulldozer class-action suit that could pay out up to $35 per chip". PCWorld. Archived from the original on 3 Oct 2024. Retrieved 2 Dec 2025.
- ↑ "Dickey v. Advanced Micro Devices" (PDF). The Register. 22 Jan 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 Feb 2024. Retrieved 2 Dec 2025.