Talk:Valve removes arbitration requirement from Steam Subscriber Agreement: Difference between revisions
m Cleaned up talk page. |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== From Someoneontheinternet == | == From Someoneontheinternet == | ||
I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative. | I wonder if the positive incident should be deleted since it's talking about a positive thing that Steam has done, as opposed to a negative action. Or maybe it's just a coincidence that almost everything on this website is negative. {{Unsigned|Someoneontheinternet|20:54, 19 January 2025}} | ||
:Naw, positives should be documented just as much as negatives. Wiki's should be free from bias, and while this one obviously has bias, there's good reason, and positives reports help to offset that. It wouldn't do well for this page to show entirely negative reports, as then it would be easier for people to dismiss this wiki entirely, if it didn't document the positives as well. {{Unsigned|Mandle Rex|02:10, 1 May 2026}} | |||