Talk:Contact Leadership of Tech Companies: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 1 June by Andrew V in topic Relevancy
→Relevancy: new section |
→Relevancy: Reply |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevancy == | ==Relevancy== | ||
I’m not sure this article is relevant enough to be on the wiki. I hate to say it, but people would probably use AI to gather the contact information over using this article. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 13:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC) | I’m not sure this article is relevant enough to be on the wiki. I hate to say it, but people would probably use AI to gather the contact information over using this article. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 13:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
:I do not consider it relevant nor useful here on CRW, as well. | |||
:*Not comparable to contacts to governmental agencies that are specifically for consumer issues, regulations, etcetera. | |||
:*Much more susceptible to {{Wplink|link rot}} than government websites and thus would require further upkeep — which would be wasted as users are far more likely to just use a search engine. | |||
:*Borderline {{Wplink|doxxing}} as [[LinkedIn]] is intended for employment purposes only, and not for advocacy about issues, customer support questions, or whatever. | |||
:Those are my thoughts on the matter. — [[User:Sojourna|Sojourna]] ([[User talk:Sojourna|talk]]) 04:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
::I also think it is doxxing [[User:Andrew V|Andrew V]] ([[User talk:Andrew V|talk]]) 16:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:01, 1 June 2026
Relevancy
[edit source]I’m not sure this article is relevant enough to be on the wiki. I hate to say it, but people would probably use AI to gather the contact information over using this article. Mr Pollo (talk) 13:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)
- I do not consider it relevant nor useful here on CRW, as well.
- Not comparable to contacts to governmental agencies that are specifically for consumer issues, regulations, etcetera.
- Much more susceptible to link rot than government websites and thus would require further upkeep — which would be wasted as users are far more likely to just use a search engine.
- Borderline doxxing as LinkedIn is intended for employment purposes only, and not for advocacy about issues, customer support questions, or whatever.
- Those are my thoughts on the matter. — Sojourna (talk) 04:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
- I also think it is doxxing Andrew V (talk) 16:01, 1 June 2026 (UTC)