Right to own: Difference between revisions
m This is one of my articles that needs some work, pointed to the spotify car thing article instead of using a ref. |
mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{StubNotice}} | {{StubNotice}} | ||
The '''right to own''' is the right for consumers to be able to completely own their products. The Consumer | The '''right to own''' is the right for consumers to be able to completely own their products. The Consumer Rights Wiki (CRW) believes that a consumer only owns their product if they have full control over it. Ownership is a key concept to consumer rights protection. | ||
==Extent of the right to own== | ==Extent of the right to own== | ||
As established, a consumer only owns their purchased product if they completely control it. If control is revocable, the consumer does not own their product. A consumer does not own their product if they pay a [[Subscription service|subscription]] for continued use. A consumer does not own their product if it [[Discontinuation bricking|bricks itself]] when the company goes out of business<ref>insert reference to company going out of business and bricking the device here</ref> or decides to [[Spotify Car Thing|discontinue production]]. A consumer does not own their product if they are unable to [[Right to repair|repair]] their device themselves due to the company going out of its way to make unauthorized repair impossible.<ref>Insert reference to apple doing this. Note: make a page about the Apple repair program being inadequate (change this from reference to direct link preferably. [[Apple authorized repair]]</ref> A consumer does not truly own their product if poor [[security]] allows unauthorized actors to use the product without permission. Any of these problems will reduce the degree to which consumers own their products and harm their right to own. Before making any purchase, consider how much of it is actually yours. | As established, a consumer only owns their purchased product if they completely control it. Below are some categories of things companies can do to limit your ownership of the products you buy, how they work, and some solid examples of each. | ||
==Subscription-Only Products (Software as a Service, SaaS)== | |||
If control is revocable, the consumer does not own their product. A consumer does not own their product if they pay a [[Subscription service|subscription]] for continued use. A consumer does not own their product if it [[Discontinuation bricking|bricks itself]] when the company goes out of business<ref>insert reference to company going out of business and bricking the device here</ref> or decides to [[Spotify Car Thing|discontinue production]]. Many software products which used to sell unlimited licenses to use and reinstall the software forever are now subscription only. | |||
'''Examples:''' [[Adobe]], [[Microsoft]], [[IoT]] Devices that rely on servers and services outside your home, with or without subscriptions | |||
==Anti-Repair Design== | |||
A consumer does not own their product if they are unable to [[Right to repair|repair]] their device themselves due to the company going out of its way to make unauthorized repair impossible.<ref>Insert reference to apple doing this. Note: make a page about the Apple repair program being inadequate (change this from reference to direct link preferably. [[Apple authorized repair]]</ref> This include things like the proprietary calibration software which [[Apple]] refuses to provide to third parties and which Apple Youtubers claim is a "feature to improve performance and security". This could also include devices made to throw away when a wear component, such as batteries, breaks after a few years, and cannot be repaired, a perfect example being [[Airpods]]. | |||
==Poor Security== | |||
A consumer does not truly own their product if poor [[security]] allows unauthorized actors to use the product without permission. Any of these problems will reduce the degree to which consumers own their products and harm their right to own. Before making any purchase, consider how much of it is actually yours. | |||
An example of this is [[car entry systems]], many of which did not use rolling code key systems and can be abused by devices like the [[Flipper Zero]], a commonly available pentesting toy. | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 12:56, 25 June 2025
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
The right to own is the right for consumers to be able to completely own their products. The Consumer Rights Wiki (CRW) believes that a consumer only owns their product if they have full control over it. Ownership is a key concept to consumer rights protection.
Extent of the right to own[edit | edit source]
As established, a consumer only owns their purchased product if they completely control it. Below are some categories of things companies can do to limit your ownership of the products you buy, how they work, and some solid examples of each.
Subscription-Only Products (Software as a Service, SaaS)[edit | edit source]
If control is revocable, the consumer does not own their product. A consumer does not own their product if they pay a subscription for continued use. A consumer does not own their product if it bricks itself when the company goes out of business[1] or decides to discontinue production. Many software products which used to sell unlimited licenses to use and reinstall the software forever are now subscription only.
Examples: Adobe, Microsoft, IoT Devices that rely on servers and services outside your home, with or without subscriptions
Anti-Repair Design[edit | edit source]
A consumer does not own their product if they are unable to repair their device themselves due to the company going out of its way to make unauthorized repair impossible.[2] This include things like the proprietary calibration software which Apple refuses to provide to third parties and which Apple Youtubers claim is a "feature to improve performance and security". This could also include devices made to throw away when a wear component, such as batteries, breaks after a few years, and cannot be repaired, a perfect example being Airpods.
Poor Security[edit | edit source]
A consumer does not truly own their product if poor security allows unauthorized actors to use the product without permission. Any of these problems will reduce the degree to which consumers own their products and harm their right to own. Before making any purchase, consider how much of it is actually yours.
An example of this is car entry systems, many of which did not use rolling code key systems and can be abused by devices like the Flipper Zero, a commonly available pentesting toy.
References[edit | edit source]
- ↑ insert reference to company going out of business and bricking the device here
- ↑ Insert reference to apple doing this. Note: make a page about the Apple repair program being inadequate (change this from reference to direct link preferably. Apple authorized repair