Netgate: Difference between revisions - Consumer_Action

Line 15:

====Consumer and Licensing Changes====

In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab<ref>https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab</ref>, a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community.

In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 Oct 2023 |title=Addressing Changes to pfSense Plus Home+Lab |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref>, a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community.

====Security Concerns with WireGuard Implementation====

In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws<ref>https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software</ref>. His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate's implementation.

In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=18 Mar 2021 |title=WireGuard Removed from pfSense® CE and pfSense® Plus Software |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref>. His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate's implementation.

====Targeting other projects====

Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/</ref> allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain<ref>https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/</ref>.

Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website<ref>{{Cite web |title=OPNSense |url=http://www.opnsense.com/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/ |archive-date=14 Mar 2016 |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=}}</ref> allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain<ref>{{Cite web |date=24 Nov 2017 |title=Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith |url=https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/ |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[OPNSense]]}}</ref>.

==Incidents==

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ====Consumer and Licensing Changes====
-In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab<ref>https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab</ref>, a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community.
+In a controversial decision, Netgate discontinued free access to pfSense Home+ Lab<ref>{{Cite web |date=26 Oct 2023 |title=Addressing Changes to pfSense Plus Home+Lab |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/addressing-changes-to-pfsense-plus-homelab |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref>, a version previously available at no cost, requiring users to migrate to CE or a paid model. This change was made without prior notice, leading to criticism from the community.
 ====Security Concerns with WireGuard Implementation====
-In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws<ref>https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software</ref>. His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate's implementation.
+In 2021, Jason Donenfeld, the creator of WireGuard, reviewed pfSense’s WireGuard implementation and identified multiple security flaws<ref>{{Cite web |last=Thompson |first=Jim |date=18 Mar 2021 |title=WireGuard Removed from pfSense® CE and pfSense® Plus Software |url=https://www.netgate.com/blog/wireguard-removed-from-pfsense-ce-and-pfsense-plus-software |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[Netgate]]}}</ref>. His review was highly critical, highlighting serious vulnerabilities that raised concerns about the security of Netgate's implementation.
 ====Targeting other projects====
-Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website<ref>https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/</ref> allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain<ref>https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/</ref>.
+Netgate's co-founder has publicly criticized competing projects, including OPNsense, a fork of pfSense. OPNsense, which is endorsed by the developers of m0n0wall (the project from which pfSense originated), was also the target of a parody website<ref>{{Cite web |title=OPNSense |url=http://www.opnsense.com/ |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160314132836/http://www.opnsense.com/ |archive-date=14 Mar 2016 |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=}}</ref> allegedly created by Netgate. OPNsense had to file a complaint with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) to gain control of the disputed domain<ref>{{Cite web |date=24 Nov 2017 |title=Netgate / pfSense acts in bad faith |url=https://opnsense.org/opnsense-com/ |url-status=live |access-date=22 Mar 2025 |website=[[OPNSense]]}}</ref>.
 ==Incidents==