Spotify: Difference between revisions
m Added category |
Added anti consumer practices, to do: insert citations/references |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Summary of anti-consumer practices== | ==Summary of anti-consumer practices== | ||
==Unfair Artist Compensation and Exploitation== | |||
===Micro Payments per Stream=== | |||
* Label Retained Royalties: | |||
:: Spotify pays artists between $0.003 and $0.005 per stream, requiring approximately 4 million monthly streams to earn $1,160, which is equal to a month of the U.S. minimum wage. High profile artists like Taylor Swift and Thom Yorke withdrew music in protest. | |||
* Policy Changes Harming Indies: | |||
:: 70% of Spotify’s revenue goes to rights holders (e.g., record labels), but artists receive only 11% to 16% after the labels take their cuts. For example, Universal Music kept 73% of Spotify payouts.<sup>1</sup><sup>3</sup> | |||
:: Spotify stopped paying royalties in 2023 for tracks with less than 1,000 annual streams, and diverted the approximately $40 million per year to major labels. This disproportionately impacted emerging artists.<sup>3</sup> | |||
===Fake Artists and Playlist Manipulation=== | |||
* Perfect Fit Content (PFC) Program: | |||
:: An internal initiative to seed playlists with AI generated or low cost music (''e.g., ambient, jazz'') from Swedish producers. These tracks replaced human artists to reduce royalty payouts.<sup>2</sup> | |||
* Fake Artist Networks: | |||
:: Investigators found 20 individuals operating under 500 aliases (''e.g., Trumpet Bumblefig, Vattio Bud'') generating millions of streams. One obscure Swedish jazz artist outperformed Grammy winning albums.<sup>2</sup> | |||
* Consumer Deception: | |||
:: Employees admitted listeners <q>wouldn’t know the difference</q> between authentic and PFC tracks, degrading content quality.<sup>2</sup> | |||
===Licensing Violations and Legal Battles=== | |||
* Unpaid Royalties: | |||
:: In 2017 Spotify faced a $1.6 billion lawsuit from Wixen Music Publishing for hosting 10,000+ unlicensed songs by artists like Tom Petty and Neil Young.<sup>4</sup> | |||
* Repeated Non Compliance: | |||
:: Despite a 2015 pledge to fix <q>bad publishing data</q> Spotify’s $43 million settlement (2017) for unpaid mechanical licenses was deemed "inadequate" by industry groups.<sup>4</sup> | |||
* Bundling Schemes: | |||
:: The National Music Publishers Association (NMPA) condemned Spotify for bundling music with audiobooks to lower royalty rates, calling it "predatory".<sup>3</sup> | |||
===Privacy Violations and Data Misuse=== | |||
* Invasive Data Collection: | |||
:: In 2015, Spotify demanded access to users’ contacts, photos, and location via mobile apps, triggering backlash over disproportionate data harvesting.<sup>8</sup> | |||
* Pay-for-Play Allegations: | |||
:: Spotify was accused of taking payments from labels to prioritize songs in playlists, mimicking payola scandals without transparency.<sup>1</sup> | |||
===Price Hikes and Subscription Exploitation=== | |||
* Forced Price Increases: | |||
:: Under pressure from record labels (''e.g., Universal Music''), Spotify raised U.S. prices by 31% for duo plans and 25% for family plans (2023–2024). Similar hikes occurred in 50+ markets. <sup>3</sup><sup>8</sup> | |||
* Label Profit Extraction: | |||
:: Labels pushed hikes under the guise of "artist fairness," yet retained most revenue. For example, Universal’s streaming revenue grew 8.9% YoY in 2024.<sup>3</sup> | |||
{| class="wikitable"cellpadding="5"border="3, solid, gray" | |||
|- | |||
|+Spotify Subcription Price Increase (2023-2024) | |||
|- | |||
! scope="col"style="text-align:left;" | Plan Type | |||
! scope="col"style="text-align:center;" | Price Increase | |||
! scope="col"style="text-align:right;" | Key Markets Affected | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row"style="text-align:left;" | Premium Individual | |||
! style="text-align:center;" | 10% | |||
! style="text-align:right;" | USA UK EU | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row"style="text-align:left;" | Premium Duo | |||
! style="text-align:center;" | 31% | |||
! style="text-align:right;" | Global | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row"style="text-align:left;" | Premium Family | |||
! style="text-align:center;" | 25% | |||
! style="text-align:right;" | 50+ countries | |||
|- | |||
! scope="row"style="text-align:left;" | Student | |||
! style="text-align:center;" | 20% | |||
! style="text-align:right;" | USA Australia | |||
|} | |||
---- | |||
===Genre Manipulation and Cultural Appropriation=== | |||
: Spotify invented vague algorithm-driven genres ''inspired by TikTok'' such as: | |||
:* '''''Stomp and Holler''''' | |||
:* '''''Escape Room''''' | |||
:* '''''pov: indie''''' | |||
---- | |||
=== Systemic Exploitation === | |||
<pre style="white-space:pre-wrap"> | |||
Despite recent profitability, Spotify relies heavily on price hikes, algorithmic manipulation and royalty suppression. These anti consumer practices come out of a profit-driven business model which prioritizes labels and shareholders over artists and listeners. The PFC program epitomizes Spotify's continued fight agianst musicians. Regulatory intervention—like the EU's antitrust actions—remains critical to force transparency and fairness. | |||
</pre> | |||
===Car Thing=== | ===Car Thing=== | ||