Nintendo: Difference between revisions

Nm8a6 (talk | contribs)
m Rust in new units of Switch 2: Made language a little bit more explicit/detailed.
m Added to the further reading section
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Visual edit
 
Line 55: Line 55:


===Nintendo authorized repair===
===Nintendo authorized repair===
<blockquote>Further Reading: [[Nintendo authorized repair]]</blockquote>A man sent in their Nintendo Switch to Nintendo for repair of a broken charging port and was given an estimate of £132 (161.51 USD) to replace the entire motherboard, which would result in data loss and noted screen damage. This was despite the only damage to the console being to the charging port and a screen protector, and not the screen itself.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=31 Jul 2021 |title=Why Nintendo authorized repair sucks: the incentives are at odds with a good repair experience |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxKJn35DK8k |url-status=live |access-date=7 May 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref> <!-- This needs more evidence to demonstrate that it's not an isolated incident and represents systematic policy. probably best to creat the incident article for it, then summarise it here --> <!-- Will write more later. This should be a good starting point, I believe.
<blockquote>Further Reading: [[Nintendo authorized repair]]
 
[[Nintendo refuses to repair water damaged Switch 2 console]]</blockquote>A man sent in their Nintendo Switch to Nintendo for repair of a broken charging port and was given an estimate of £132 (161.51 USD) to replace the entire motherboard, which would result in data loss and noted screen damage. This was despite the only damage to the console being to the charging port and a screen protector, and not the screen itself.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Rossmann |first=Louis |date=31 Jul 2021 |title=Why Nintendo authorized repair sucks: the incentives are at odds with a good repair experience |url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxKJn35DK8k |url-status=live |access-date=7 May 2025 |website=[[YouTube]]}}</ref> <!-- This needs more evidence to demonstrate that it's not an isolated incident and represents systematic policy. probably best to creat the incident article for it, then summarise it here --> <!-- Will write more later. This should be a good starting point, I believe.