Jump to content

Wikimedia Foundation: Difference between revisions

From Consumer Rights Wiki
Kai (talk | contribs)
m Added the Wikimedia Foundation Logo
JackFromWisconsin (talk | contribs)
Add a couple of recent incidents involving censorship of Wikipedia
Line 10: Line 10:


==Consumer-impact summary==
==Consumer-impact summary==
{{Ph-C-CIS}}
The Wikimedia Foundation is generally pro-consumer and privacy first, despite having some notable incidents.


==Incidents==
==Incidents==
{{Ph-C-Inc}}
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the [[:Category:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|{{PAGENAME}} category]].
===Example incident one (''date'')===
===UK Online Safety Act lawsuit (2025-present)===
{{Main|link to the main article}}
{{Main|Implementation_of_the_UK_Online_Safety_Act#Wikipedia}}
Short summary of the incident (could be the same as the summary preceding the article).
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) sued the United Kingdom to prevent them from forcing age checks on their websites. The WMF made a statement that being forced to comply with this act would compromise the privacy of its editors and the neutrality of the encyclopedia. On August 11, 2025, the London High Court denied the WMF's reasoning, but didn't necessarily force age checks for the website.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Castro |first=Chiara |date=August 12, 2025 |title=Case dismissed – Wikipedia loses UK Online Safety Act legal challenge, but it may still be safe from age checks |url=https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/case-dismissed-wikipedia-loses-uk-online-safety-act-legal-challenge-but-it-may-still-be-safe-from-age-checks}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 August 2025 |title=Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations |url=https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/08/11/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/}}</ref>
===Example incident two (''date'')===
...
 
==Products==
{{Ph-C-P}}


==See also==
=== ''Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation''  (2024-present) ===
{{Ph-C-SA}}
The news agency [[Asian News International]] sued the Wikimedia Foundation in July 2024 in India. They alleged defamation and forced the WMF to censor its "''Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation''" article from October 2024 until May 2025 upon appeal by the WMF.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Drawing a line in the sand: SC judgment reaffirms right to free speech |url=https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/free-speech-freedom-of-expresion-wikipedia-case-9997614/lite/}}</ref>


==References==
==References==

Revision as of 14:51, 16 August 2025

Wikimedia Foundation
Basic information
Founded 2003-06-20
Legal Structure Non-profit
Industry Information Technology
Official website https://wikimediafoundation.org/

The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (WMF) is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization headquartered in San Francisco, California, and registered there as a charitable foundation. It is the host of Wikipedia, the tenth most visited website in the world. It also hosts fourteen related open collaboration projects, and supports the development of MediaWiki, the wiki software which underpins them all. The foundation was established in 2003 in St. Petersburg, Florida by Jimmy Wales, as a non-profit way to fund Wikipedia and other wiki projects which had previously been hosted by Bomis, Wales' for-profit company.

Consumer-impact summary

The Wikimedia Foundation is generally pro-consumer and privacy first, despite having some notable incidents.

Incidents

This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Wikimedia Foundation category.

UK Online Safety Act lawsuit (2025-present)

Main article: Implementation_of_the_UK_Online_Safety_Act#Wikipedia

The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) sued the United Kingdom to prevent them from forcing age checks on their websites. The WMF made a statement that being forced to comply with this act would compromise the privacy of its editors and the neutrality of the encyclopedia. On August 11, 2025, the London High Court denied the WMF's reasoning, but didn't necessarily force age checks for the website.[1][2]

Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation (2024-present)

The news agency Asian News International sued the Wikimedia Foundation in July 2024 in India. They alleged defamation and forced the WMF to censor its "Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation" article from October 2024 until May 2025 upon appeal by the WMF.[3]

References

  1. Castro, Chiara (August 12, 2025). "Case dismissed – Wikipedia loses UK Online Safety Act legal challenge, but it may still be safe from age checks".
  2. "Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations". 11 August 2025.
  3. "Drawing a line in the sand: SC judgment reaffirms right to free speech".