Wikimedia Foundation: Difference between revisions
→Caesar DePaço lawsuit (2021-present): add details about the WMF having to reveal certain data about its editors |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
===UK Online Safety Act lawsuit (2025-present)=== | ===UK Online Safety Act lawsuit (2025-present)=== | ||
{{Main|Implementation_of_the_UK_Online_Safety_Act#Wikipedia}} | {{Main|Implementation_of_the_UK_Online_Safety_Act#Wikipedia}} | ||
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) sued the United Kingdom to prevent them from forcing age checks on their websites. The WMF made a statement that being forced to comply with this act would compromise the privacy of its editors and the neutrality of the encyclopedia. On August 11, 2025, the London High Court denied the WMF's reasoning, but didn't necessarily force age checks for the website.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Castro |first=Chiara |date=August 12, 2025 |title=Case dismissed – Wikipedia loses UK Online Safety Act legal challenge, but it may still be safe from age checks |url=https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/case-dismissed-wikipedia-loses-uk-online-safety-act-legal-challenge-but-it-may-still-be-safe-from-age-checks}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 August 2025 |title=Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations |url=https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/08/11/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/}}</ref> | The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) sued the United Kingdom to prevent them from forcing age checks on their websites. The WMF made a statement that being forced to comply with this act would compromise the privacy of its editors and the neutrality of the encyclopedia. On August 11, 2025, the London High Court denied the WMF's reasoning, but didn't necessarily force age checks for the website.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Castro |first=Chiara |date=August 12, 2025 |title=Case dismissed – Wikipedia loses UK Online Safety Act legal challenge, but it may still be safe from age checks |url=https://www.techradar.com/vpn/vpn-privacy-security/case-dismissed-wikipedia-loses-uk-online-safety-act-legal-challenge-but-it-may-still-be-safe-from-age-checks}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=11 August 2025 |title=Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations |url=https://wikimediafoundation.org/news/2025/08/11/wikimedia-foundation-challenges-uk-online-safety-act-regulations/}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |last=Clifton |first=Mizy |date=August 11, 2025 |title=Wikipedia loses challenge to UK Online Safety Act |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/wikipedia-loses-challenge-to-uk-online-safety-act/ |work=Politico}}</ref> | ||
===''Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation'' (2024-present)=== | ===''Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation'' (2024-present)=== | ||
Revision as of 16:47, 16 August 2025
| Basic information | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 2003-06-20 |
| Legal Structure | Non-profit |
| Industry | Information Technology |
| Official website | https://wikimediafoundation.org/ |
The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. (WMF) is an American 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization headquartered in San Francisco, California, and registered there as a charitable foundation. It is the host of Wikipedia, the tenth most visited website in the world. It also hosts fourteen related open collaboration projects, and supports the development of MediaWiki, the wiki software which underpins them all. The foundation was established in 2003 in St. Petersburg, Florida by Jimmy Wales, as a non-profit way to fund Wikipedia and other wiki projects which had previously been hosted by Bomis, Wales' for-profit company.
Consumer-impact summary
The Wikimedia Foundation is generally pro-consumer and privacy first, despite having some notable incidents.
Various courts have successfully sued the company into censoring certain articles. These articles have a warning notice when viewed from Wikipedia so you at least know you aren't getting what you want.
- User freedom: Open source project
- User privacy: Accounts are private, no known data breaches.
- Business model: Funding entirely through donations, including corporate donations
- Market competition: Some, including Encyclopedia Britannica.
Incidents
This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the Wikimedia Foundation category.
UK Online Safety Act lawsuit (2025-present)
- Main article: Implementation_of_the_UK_Online_Safety_Act#Wikipedia
The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) sued the United Kingdom to prevent them from forcing age checks on their websites. The WMF made a statement that being forced to comply with this act would compromise the privacy of its editors and the neutrality of the encyclopedia. On August 11, 2025, the London High Court denied the WMF's reasoning, but didn't necessarily force age checks for the website.[1][2][3]
Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation (2024-present)
The news agency Asian News International sued the Wikimedia Foundation in July 2024 in India. They alleged defamation and forced the WMF to censor its "Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation" article from October 2024 until May 2025 upon appeal by the WMF.[4]
Caesar DePaço lawsuit (2021-present)
Portuguese businessman Caesar DePaço sued the Wikimedia Foundation in 2021 demanding removal of certain information in the Wikipedia article about him. In August 2025 the WMF complied with the decision by the Portuguese court and partially censored the article. Today, this article is censored and unable to be in compliance with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View guideline.[5][6] Pursuant to the court order, the WMF had to reveal IP addresses and email addresses to the court.[7]
References
- ↑ Castro, Chiara (August 12, 2025). "Case dismissed – Wikipedia loses UK Online Safety Act legal challenge, but it may still be safe from age checks".
- ↑ "Wikimedia Foundation Challenges UK Online Safety Act Regulations". 11 August 2025.
- ↑ Clifton, Mizy (August 11, 2025). "Wikipedia loses challenge to UK Online Safety Act". Politico.
- ↑ "Drawing a line in the sand: SC judgment reaffirms right to free speech".
- ↑ "Wikipedia Fighting Overseas SLAPP Suit Because Someone Didn't Like The Factual Info Posted About Them".
- ↑ "Office action: Removals on the article Caesar DePaço". English Wikipedia. 4 August 2025.
- ↑ "Court order snips out part of Wikipedia article, editors debate whether to frame shreds or pulp them". Wikipedia Signpost. 2025-08-09.