CgNAT: Difference between revisions
Created page with "{{StubNotice}} Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (cgNAT, also known as LSN and NAT444) is used by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to mitigate IPv4 address exhaustion by making thousands of customers share a single public IPv4 address. === Complaints from law enforcement agencies === Law enforcement agencies find it harder to identify criminals behind an IPv4 address used by thousands of people. As a result the agency may have to tap connections of all users s..." |
m Added the 2016 europol study as a source |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (cgNAT, also known as LSN and NAT444) is used by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to mitigate IPv4 address exhaustion by making thousands of customers share a single public IPv4 address. | Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (cgNAT, also known as LSN and NAT444) is used by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to mitigate IPv4 address exhaustion by making thousands of customers share a single public IPv4 address. | ||
=== Complaints from law enforcement agencies === | ===Complaints from law enforcement agencies=== | ||
Law enforcement agencies find it harder to identify criminals behind an IPv4 address used by thousands of people. As a result the agency may have to tap connections of all users sharing that address to identify the criminal. <ref>{{Cite web |last=European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) |date=17 Oct 2017 |title=Are you sharing the same IP address as a criminal? Law enforcement call for the end of Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) to increase accountability online |url=https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/are-you-sharing-same-ip-address-criminal-law-enforcement-call-for-end-of-carrier-grade-nat-cgn-to-increase-accountability-online |website=europol.europa.eu}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Gözükara |first=Furkan |date=8 Nov 2021 |title=Challenges and possible severe legal consequences of application users identification from CNG-Logs |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2666281721002377 |website=sciencedirect.com}}</ref> | Law enforcement agencies find it harder to identify criminals behind an IPv4 address used by thousands of people. As a result the agency may have to tap connections of all users sharing that address to identify the criminal. <ref>{{Cite web |last=European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) |date=17 Oct 2017 |title=Are you sharing the same IP address as a criminal? Law enforcement call for the end of Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) to increase accountability online |url=https://www.europol.europa.eu/media-press/newsroom/news/are-you-sharing-same-ip-address-criminal-law-enforcement-call-for-end-of-carrier-grade-nat-cgn-to-increase-accountability-online |website=europol.europa.eu}}</ref><ref name=":0">{{Cite web |last=Gözükara |first=Furkan |date=8 Nov 2021 |title=Challenges and possible severe legal consequences of application users identification from CNG-Logs |url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2666281721002377 |website=sciencedirect.com}}</ref> | ||
A 2016 survey conducted by the European Cybercrime Centre revealed that 90% of EU Member State cyber divisions regularly encountered errors related to CGNAT technologies during investigations, sometimes forcing them to discontinue cases or employ more resource-intensive approaches. <ref name=":0" /> | A 2016 survey conducted by the European Cybercrime Centre revealed that 90% of EU Member State cyber divisions regularly encountered errors related to CGNAT technologies during investigations, sometimes forcing them to discontinue cases or employ more resource-intensive approaches. <ref>{{Cite web |last=European Police Office (Europol) |title=IOCTA 2016 INTERNET ORGANISED CRIME THREAT ASSESSMENT |url=https://www.europol.europa.eu/iocta/2016/resources/iocta-2016.pdf |website=europol.europa.eu}}</ref><ref name=":0" /> | ||
The process of reverse-tracking from cgNAT logs is fundamentally flawed. In criminal cases where cgNAT logs are used as primary evidence, there exists significant potential for misidentification, as the same public IP address and port combination might be reassigned to different users within a very short time. <ref name=":0" /> | The process of reverse-tracking from cgNAT logs is fundamentally flawed. In criminal cases where cgNAT logs are used as primary evidence, there exists significant potential for misidentification, as the same public IP address and port combination might be reassigned to different users within a very short time. <ref name=":0" /> | ||
=== Security concerns === | ===Security concerns=== | ||
If a malicious actor using a cgNAT IP address gets blacklisted by a server/website then all users sharing the same cgNAT IP will also get blacklisted. <ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Asturias |first=Diego |date=21 Jul 2025 |title=CGNAT: The Workaround to IPv4 Depletion [2025] |url=https://www.rapidseedbox.com/blog/cgnat |website=rapidseedbox.com}}</ref> | If a malicious actor using a cgNAT IP address gets blacklisted by a server/website then all users sharing the same cgNAT IP will also get blacklisted. <ref name=":1">{{Cite web |last=Asturias |first=Diego |date=21 Jul 2025 |title=CGNAT: The Workaround to IPv4 Depletion [2025] |url=https://www.rapidseedbox.com/blog/cgnat |website=rapidseedbox.com}}</ref> | ||
A DDoS attack targeted at one user behind a cgNAT IP address affects all users behind that address, which can disrupt service for entire neighborhoods. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Newman |first=Sean |date=8 Mar 2022 |title=There Goes the Neighborhood: The DDoS Disadvantages of Carrier Grade NAT |url=https://www.corero.com/ddos-disadvantages-of-carrier-grade-nat/ |website=corero.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Turner |first=Glen |date=1 Oct 2019 |title=The Effect of DDoS Attacks on Carrier-grade NAT Devices |url=https://www.a10networks.com/resources/videos/the-effect-of-ddos-attacks-on-carrier-grade-nat-devices/ |website=a10networks.com}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> | A DDoS attack targeted at one user behind a cgNAT IP address affects all users behind that address, which can disrupt service for entire neighborhoods. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Newman |first=Sean |date=8 Mar 2022 |title=There Goes the Neighborhood: The DDoS Disadvantages of Carrier Grade NAT |url=https://www.corero.com/ddos-disadvantages-of-carrier-grade-nat/ |website=corero.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Turner |first=Glen |date=1 Oct 2019 |title=The Effect of DDoS Attacks on Carrier-grade NAT Devices |url=https://www.a10networks.com/resources/videos/the-effect-of-ddos-attacks-on-carrier-grade-nat-devices/ |website=a10networks.com}}</ref><ref name=":1" /> | ||
=== Service limitations === | ===Service limitations=== | ||
Because multiple people share the same public IP address, they are unreachable from the internet. This prevents them from hosting personal websites or having remote access to home security cameras or personal computers. cgNAT basically breaks all protocols that require direct connection to work. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Swer |first=Daryll |date=25 Mar 2021 |title=Shortcomings of CGNAT and Potential Workarounds |url=https://www.daryllswer.com/shortcomings-of-cgnat-and-potential-work-arounds/ |website=daryllswer.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Pros & Cons Deploying Carrier Grade NAT (CGNAT) |url=https://brandergroup.net/2023/01/benefits-and-issues-deploying-carrier-grade-network-address-translation-cgnat/ |website=brandergroup.net}}</ref> | Because multiple people share the same public IP address, they are unreachable from the internet. This prevents them from hosting personal websites or having remote access to home security cameras or personal computers. cgNAT basically breaks all protocols that require direct connection to work. <ref>{{Cite web |last=Swer |first=Daryll |date=25 Mar 2021 |title=Shortcomings of CGNAT and Potential Workarounds |url=https://www.daryllswer.com/shortcomings-of-cgnat-and-potential-work-arounds/ |website=daryllswer.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Pros & Cons Deploying Carrier Grade NAT (CGNAT) |url=https://brandergroup.net/2023/01/benefits-and-issues-deploying-carrier-grade-network-address-translation-cgnat/ |website=brandergroup.net}}</ref> | ||
To circumvent these limitations, ISPs typically offer subscriptions for dedicated IPv4 addresses or IPv6 tunnels. | To circumvent these limitations, ISPs typically offer subscriptions for dedicated IPv4 addresses or IPv6 tunnels. | ||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 22:26, 6 September 2025
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
Carrier-Grade Network Address Translation (cgNAT, also known as LSN and NAT444) is used by Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to mitigate IPv4 address exhaustion by making thousands of customers share a single public IPv4 address.
Complaints from law enforcement agencies
Law enforcement agencies find it harder to identify criminals behind an IPv4 address used by thousands of people. As a result the agency may have to tap connections of all users sharing that address to identify the criminal. [1][2]
A 2016 survey conducted by the European Cybercrime Centre revealed that 90% of EU Member State cyber divisions regularly encountered errors related to CGNAT technologies during investigations, sometimes forcing them to discontinue cases or employ more resource-intensive approaches. [3][2]
The process of reverse-tracking from cgNAT logs is fundamentally flawed. In criminal cases where cgNAT logs are used as primary evidence, there exists significant potential for misidentification, as the same public IP address and port combination might be reassigned to different users within a very short time. [2]
Security concerns
If a malicious actor using a cgNAT IP address gets blacklisted by a server/website then all users sharing the same cgNAT IP will also get blacklisted. [4]
A DDoS attack targeted at one user behind a cgNAT IP address affects all users behind that address, which can disrupt service for entire neighborhoods. [5][6][4]
Service limitations
Because multiple people share the same public IP address, they are unreachable from the internet. This prevents them from hosting personal websites or having remote access to home security cameras or personal computers. cgNAT basically breaks all protocols that require direct connection to work. [7][8]
To circumvent these limitations, ISPs typically offer subscriptions for dedicated IPv4 addresses or IPv6 tunnels.
- ↑ European Cybercrime Centre (EC3) (17 Oct 2017). "Are you sharing the same IP address as a criminal? Law enforcement call for the end of Carrier Grade NAT (CGN) to increase accountability online". europol.europa.eu.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link) - ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Gözükara, Furkan (8 Nov 2021). "Challenges and possible severe legal consequences of application users identification from CNG-Logs". sciencedirect.com.
- ↑ European Police Office (Europol). "IOCTA 2016 INTERNET ORGANISED CRIME THREAT ASSESSMENT" (PDF). europol.europa.eu.
- ↑ 4.0 4.1 Asturias, Diego (21 Jul 2025). "CGNAT: The Workaround to IPv4 Depletion [2025]". rapidseedbox.com.
- ↑ Newman, Sean (8 Mar 2022). "There Goes the Neighborhood: The DDoS Disadvantages of Carrier Grade NAT". corero.com.
- ↑ Turner, Glen (1 Oct 2019). "The Effect of DDoS Attacks on Carrier-grade NAT Devices". a10networks.com.
- ↑ Swer, Daryll (25 Mar 2021). "Shortcomings of CGNAT and Potential Workarounds". daryllswer.com.
- ↑ "Pros & Cons Deploying Carrier Grade NAT (CGNAT)". brandergroup.net.