Talk:Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: Yesterday at 15:58 by Keith in topic Building this article up
→Building this article up: new section |
→Building this article up: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Building this article up == | ==Building this article up== | ||
Our article on [[Apple]] is EXTREMELY disorganized, so this is part of a cleanup effort to reorganize the page by grouping incidents together since a lot of them are under the same banner as contributing to e-waste. I have already taken a few notes of what to add here from the existing article, but I will be adding extra information to here as well. Do at least try to give this the same amount of respect that a theme article gets, since this feels like it could be in the same boat. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 14:34, 11 September 2025 (UTC) | Our article on [[Apple]] is EXTREMELY disorganized, so this is part of a cleanup effort to reorganize the page by grouping incidents together since a lot of them are under the same banner as contributing to e-waste. I have already taken a few notes of what to add here from the existing article, but I will be adding extra information to here as well. Do at least try to give this the same amount of respect that a theme article gets, since this feels like it could be in the same boat. [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 14:34, 11 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I wonder whether this might be better reframed - as the practices that lead to e-waste are often anti-consumer, we should be framing them from an anti-consumer perspective rather than an environmental one. maybe 'Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices', or something similar? [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 15:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:58, 11 September 2025
Building this article up
Our article on Apple is EXTREMELY disorganized, so this is part of a cleanup effort to reorganize the page by grouping incidents together since a lot of them are under the same banner as contributing to e-waste. I have already taken a few notes of what to add here from the existing article, but I will be adding extra information to here as well. Do at least try to give this the same amount of respect that a theme article gets, since this feels like it could be in the same boat. JamesTDG (talk) 14:34, 11 September 2025 (UTC)
- I wonder whether this might be better reframed - as the practices that lead to e-waste are often anti-consumer, we should be framing them from an anti-consumer perspective rather than an environmental one. maybe 'Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices', or something similar? Keith (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2025 (UTC)