Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices: Difference between revisions
m Keith moved page Apple's contributions to e-waste to Apple's anti-repair and anti-refurbishment practices |
No edit summary Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Delete|Content can easily fit on the [[Apple]] article}} | |||
{{StubNotice}}{{IncidentCargo | {{StubNotice}}{{IncidentCargo | ||
|Company=Apple | |Company=Apple |
Revision as of 16:21, 12 September 2025
⚠️ A deletion request has been made for this article
There has been a deletion request for this page for the following reason:
Content can easily fit on the Apple article
This request will be reviewed and acted upon by the wiki moderation team within one week of the template being added.
To appeal this deletion request, please make an entry at the Moderator's noticeboard.
- Apple's contributions to e-waste (redirect page) (← links | edit)
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
Since the inception of the iPhone in 2007, Apple has contributed severely to the production of e-waste from its products by blocking consumers in various methods. This has ranged from authorized repair, to the blocking of sideloading 3rd-party software, and disposing of legacy apps and legacy appstore access.
Relevant incidents
Flawed hardware design
Apple's response
Blocking operating system downgrades
Blocking 3rd-party apps
Lawsuits
Consumer response
References