{{Incomplete|Issue 1=Article needs overhaul to be substantial theme article or list article}}{{StubNotice}}
{{StubNotice}}
{{IncidentCargo
{{IncidentCargo
Revision as of 13:55, 7 November 2025
⚠️Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete
This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:
Article needs overhaul to be substantial theme article or list article
This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals channel.
Learn more ▼
This Article Requires Additional Verification
This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!
Why This Article Is In Question
Articles in this wiki are required to:
Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.
Examples of issues that trigger this notice:
A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.
How You Can Improve This Article
To address verification concerns:
Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.
If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues.
Learn more ▼
Issues may include:
This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content
How you can help:
Add documented examples with verifiable sources
Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
Car producers are forcing drivers to agree to invasive spying by locking them out of some car features until they comply.
Background
New cars with "smart" panels are forcing drivers to agree every time they start their car to sharing their information. If driver do not click Agree button panel is not usable, locking driver out of some features of car. There is no other option then to agree.
This is translation from Czech to English: "Do not use the unit while driving. The driver is always responsible for complying with traffic laws. There are connected services. Information about the vehicle, for example its location, is shared with Suzuki."Hyundai forcing driver to agree to spying on them by locking some features of the car.Link in the message: hyundaiusa.com/owner-privacy-policy.aspx
Consumer response
Drivers in EU have right to request the data car producers collected on them.
References
Add a category with the same name as the product, service, website, software, product line or company that this article is about.
The "Incidents" category is not needed.
Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.