Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
Thank Mods! [[User:Privacywarrior|Privacywarrior]] ([[User talk:Privacywarrior|talk]]) 19:11, 28 September 2025 (UTC) | Thank Mods! [[User:Privacywarrior|Privacywarrior]] ([[User talk:Privacywarrior|talk]]) 19:11, 28 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:So sorry for not getting to this sooner. | |||
:For now, I've changed the relevancy tag to an incomplete one (lacking verification), the issue being that there are no sources that actually implicate itron in having done anything wrong, with most of the stuff surrounding 'maybe it could be/has been hacked' being authorial speculation insofar as I can tell. | |||
:There's also no secondary reporting - i.e. no media sources cited as framing any of these things as a problem. This is something which should be there to demonstrate notability. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 09:54, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Watch out for this person== | ==Watch out for this person== | ||
| Line 172: | Line 176: | ||
:To be honest, not a mod but I don’t think this is possible. The top contributors leaderboard is made by an extension (like a game mod of sorts) and I doubt it’d have customization mainly because of that. Come on though, how am I meant to get 60 edits? Watch New user message’s contribs page and do some random edit there every time? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i><b>AnotherConsumerRightsPerson</b></i>]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | :To be honest, not a mod but I don’t think this is possible. The top contributors leaderboard is made by an extension (like a game mod of sorts) and I doubt it’d have customization mainly because of that. Come on though, how am I meant to get 60 edits? Watch New user message’s contribs page and do some random edit there every time? [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i><b>AnotherConsumerRightsPerson</b></i>]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:02, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
== In the verifiability section, aren't government policies, regulations with propagandas/agendas allowed to be cited there? | ==In the verifiability section, aren't government policies, regulations with propagandas/agendas allowed to be cited there?== | ||
I'm just wondering if this can cause concerns for staffs in this wiki, for example [https://www.resecurity.com/blog/article/shinyhunters-attacked-vietnams-financial-system-cic-data-leak like this one] (there's english translation but it's all google translated and for full texts translation it's locked behind paywall, so apologies for that) [[User:Justarandomguy111|Justarandomguy111]] ([[User talk:Justarandomguy111|talk]]) 09:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | I'm just wondering if this can cause concerns for staffs in this wiki, for example [https://www.resecurity.com/blog/article/shinyhunters-attacked-vietnams-financial-system-cic-data-leak like this one] (there's english translation but it's all google translated and for full texts translation it's locked behind paywall, so apologies for that) [[User:Justarandomguy111|Justarandomguy111]] ([[User talk:Justarandomguy111|talk]]) 09:42, 18 October 2025 (UTC) | ||